Back to Search Start Over

Improving Super-Resolution Mapping by Combining Multiple Realizations Obtained Using the Indicator-Geostatistics Based Method

Improving Super-Resolution Mapping by Combining Multiple Realizations Obtained Using the Indicator-Geostatistics Based Method

Authors :
Zhongkui Shi
Peijun Li
Huiran Jin
Yugang Tian
Yan Chen
Xianfeng Zhang
Source :
Remote Sensing, Vol 9, Iss 8, p 773 (2017)
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
MDPI AG, 2017.

Abstract

Indicator-geostatistics based super-resolution mapping (IGSRM) is a popular super-resolution mapping (SRM) method. Unlike most existing SRM methods that produce only one SRM result each, IGSRM generates multiple equally plausible super-resolution realizations (i.e., SRM results). However, multiple super-resolution realizations are not desirable in many applications, where only one SRM result is usually required. These super-resolution realizations may have different strengths and weaknesses. This paper proposes a novel two-step combination method of generating a single SRM result from multiple super-resolution realizations obtained by IGSRM. In the first step of the method, a constrained majority rule is proposed to combine multiple super-resolution realizations generated by IGSRM into a single SRM result under the class proportion constraint. In the second step, partial pixel swapping is proposed to further improve the SRM result obtained in the previous step. The proposed combination method was evaluated for two study areas. The proposed method was quantitatively compared with IGSRM and Multiple SRM (M-SRM), an existing multiple SRM result combination method, in terms of thematic accuracy and geometric accuracy. Experimental results show that the proposed method produces SRM results that are better than those of IGSRM and M-SRM. For example, in the first example, the overall accuracy of the proposed method is 7.43–10.96% higher than that of the IGSRM method for different scale factors, and 1.09–3.44% higher than that of the M-SRM, while, in the second example, the improvement in overall accuracy is 2.42–4.92%, and 0.08–0.90%, respectively. The proposed method provides a general framework for combining multiple results from different SRM methods.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20724292
Volume :
9
Issue :
8
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Remote Sensing
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.4113cf2c543434a9a5060c001f3269f
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9080773