Back to Search Start Over

The DOE E3SM Coupled Model Version 1: Overview and Evaluation at Standard Resolution

Authors :
Jean‐Christophe Golaz
Peter M. Caldwell
Luke P. Van Roekel
Mark R. Petersen
Qi Tang
Jonathan D. Wolfe
Guta Abeshu
Valentine Anantharaj
Xylar S. Asay‐Davis
David C. Bader
Sterling A. Baldwin
Gautam Bisht
Peter A. Bogenschutz
Marcia Branstetter
Michael A. Brunke
Steven R. Brus
Susannah M. Burrows
Philip J. Cameron‐Smith
Aaron S. Donahue
Michael Deakin
Richard C. Easter
Katherine J. Evans
Yan Feng
Mark Flanner
James G. Foucar
Jeremy G. Fyke
Brian M. Griffin
Cécile Hannay
Bryce E. Harrop
Mattthew J. Hoffman
Elizabeth C. Hunke
Robert L. Jacob
Douglas W. Jacobsen
Nicole Jeffery
Philip W. Jones
Noel D. Keen
Stephen A. Klein
Vincent E. Larson
L. Ruby Leung
Hong‐Yi Li
Wuyin Lin
William H. Lipscomb
Po‐Lun Ma
Salil Mahajan
Mathew E. Maltrud
Azamat Mametjanov
Julie L. McClean
Renata B. McCoy
Richard B. Neale
Stephen F. Price
Yun Qian
Philip J. Rasch
J. E. Jack Reeves Eyre
William J. Riley
Todd D. Ringler
Andrew F. Roberts
Erika L. Roesler
Andrew G. Salinger
Zeshawn Shaheen
Xiaoying Shi
Balwinder Singh
Jinyun Tang
Mark A. Taylor
Peter E. Thornton
Adrian K. Turner
Milena Veneziani
Hui Wan
Hailong Wang
Shanlin Wang
Dean N. Williams
Phillip J. Wolfram
Patrick H. Worley
Shaocheng Xie
Yang Yang
Jin‐Ho Yoon
Mark D. Zelinka
Charles S. Zender
Xubin Zeng
Chengzhu Zhang
Kai Zhang
Yuying Zhang
Xue Zheng
Tian Zhou
Qing Zhu
Source :
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol 11, Iss 7, Pp 2089-2129 (2019)
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2019.

Abstract

Abstract This work documents the first version of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) new Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SMv1). We focus on the standard resolution of the fully coupled physical model designed to address DOE mission‐relevant water cycle questions. Its components include atmosphere and land (110‐km grid spacing), ocean and sea ice (60 km in the midlatitudes and 30 km at the equator and poles), and river transport (55 km) models. This base configuration will also serve as a foundation for additional configurations exploring higher horizontal resolution as well as augmented capabilities in the form of biogeochemistry and cryosphere configurations. The performance of E3SMv1 is evaluated by means of a standard set of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Characterization of Klima simulations consisting of a long preindustrial control, historical simulations (ensembles of fully coupled and prescribed SSTs) as well as idealized CO2 forcing simulations. The model performs well overall with biases typical of other CMIP‐class models, although the simulated Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation is weaker than many CMIP‐class models. While the E3SMv1 historical ensemble captures the bulk of the observed warming between preindustrial (1850) and present day, the trajectory of the warming diverges from observations in the second half of the twentieth century with a period of delayed warming followed by an excessive warming trend. Using a two‐layer energy balance model, we attribute this divergence to the model's strong aerosol‐related effective radiative forcing (ERFari+aci = −1.65 W/m2) and high equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS = 5.3 K).

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19422466
Volume :
11
Issue :
7
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.41308c66b425453fb24bef57ead160e2
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001603