Back to Search Start Over

3-month versus 6-month adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with high-risk stage II and III colorectal cancer: 3-year follow-up of the SCOT non-inferiority RCT

Authors :
Timothy Iveson
Kathleen A Boyd
Rachel S Kerr
Jose Robles-Zurita
Mark P Saunders
Andrew H Briggs
Jim Cassidy
Niels Henrik Hollander
Josep Tabernero
Andrew Haydon
Bengt Glimelius
Andrea Harkin
Karen Allan
John McQueen
Sarah Pearson
Ashita Waterston
Louise Medley
Charles Wilson
Richard Ellis
Sharadah Essapen
Amandeep S Dhadda
Mark Harrison
Stephen Falk
Sherif Raouf
Charlotte Rees
Rene K Olesen
David Propper
John Bridgewater
Ashraf Azzabi
David Farrugia
Andrew Webb
David Cunningham
Tamas Hickish
Andrew Weaver
Simon Gollins
Harpreet Wasan
James Paul
Source :
Health Technology Assessment, Vol 23, Iss 64 (2019)
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
NIHR Journals Library, 2019.

Abstract

Background: Oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy administered over 6 months is the standard adjuvant regimen for patients with high-risk stage II or III colorectal cancer. However, the regimen is associated with cumulative toxicity, characterised by chronic and often irreversible neuropathy. Objectives: To assess the efficacy of 3-month versus 6-month adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer and to compare the toxicity, health-related quality of life and cost-effectiveness of the durations. Design: An international, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority, Phase III, parallel-group trial. Setting: A total of 244 oncology clinics from six countries: UK (England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland), Denmark, Spain, Sweden, Australia and New Zealand. Participants: Adults aged ≥ 18 years who had undergone curative resection for high-risk stage II or III adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum. Interventions: The adjuvant treatment regimen was either oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil or oxaliplatin and capecitabine, randomised to be administered over 3 or 6 months. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was disease-free survival. Overall survival, adverse events, neuropathy and health-related quality of life were also assessed. The main cost categories were chemotherapy treatment and hospitalisation. Cost-effectiveness was assessed through incremental cost comparisons and quality-adjusted life-year gains between the options and was reported as net monetary benefit using a willingness-to-pay threshold of £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year per patient. Results: Recruitment is closed. In total, 6088 patients were randomised (3044 per group) between 27 March 2008 and 29 November 2013, with 6065 included in the intention-to-treat analyses (3-month analysis, n = 3035; 6-month analysis, n = 3030). Follow-up for the primary analysis is complete. The 3-year disease-free survival rate in the 3-month treatment group was 76.7% (standard error 0.8%) and in the 6-month treatment group was 77.1% (standard error 0.8%), equating to a hazard ratio of 1.006 (95% confidence interval 0.909 to 1.114; p-value for non-inferiority = 0.012), confirming non-inferiority for 3-month adjuvant chemotherapy. Frequent adverse events (alopecia, anaemia, anorexia, diarrhoea, fatigue, hand–foot syndrome, mucositis, sensory neuropathy, neutropenia, pain, rash, altered taste, thrombocytopenia and watery eye) showed a significant increase in grade with 6-month duration; the greatest difference was for sensory neuropathy (grade ≥ 3 was 4% for 3-month vs.16% for 6-month duration), for which a higher rate of neuropathy was seen for the 6-month treatment group from month 4 to ≥ 5 years (p

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13665278 and 20464924
Volume :
23
Issue :
64
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Health Technology Assessment
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.4215111445164519a465163178fd46e0
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3310/hta23640