Back to Search Start Over

Re‐evaluation of sodium nitrate (E 251) and potassium nitrate (E 252) as food additives

Authors :
EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS)
Alicja Mortensen
Fernando Aguilar
Riccardo Crebelli
Alessandro Di Domenico
Birgit Dusemund
Maria Jose Frutos
Pierre Galtier
David Gott
Ursula Gundert‐Remy
Claude Lambré
Jean‐Charles Leblanc
Oliver Lindtner
Peter Moldeus
Pasquale Mosesso
Agneta Oskarsson
Dominique Parent‐Massin
Ivan Stankovic
Ine Waalkens‐Berendsen
Rudolf Antonius Woutersen
Matthew Wright
Piet van den Brandt
Cristina Fortes
Leonardo Merino
Fidel Toldrà
Davide Arcella
Anna Christodoulidou
Federica Barrucci
Ana Garcia
Fabiola Pizzo
Dario Battacchi
Maged Younes
Source :
EFSA Journal, Vol 15, Iss 6, Pp n/a-n/a (2017)
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
Wiley, 2017.

Abstract

Abstract The Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) provided a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of sodium nitrate (E 251) and potassium nitrate (E 252) when used as food additives. The current acceptable daily intakes (ADIs) for nitrate of 3.7 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day were established by the SCF (1997) and JECFA (2002). The available data did not indicate genotoxic potential for sodium and potassium nitrate. The carcinogenicity studies in mice and rats were negative. The Panel considered the derivation of an ADI for nitrate based on the formation of methaemoglobin, following the conversion of nitrate, excreted in the saliva, to nitrite. However, there were large variations in the data on the nitrate‐to‐nitrite conversion in the saliva in humans. Therefore, the Panel considered that it was not possible to derive a single value of the ADI from the available data. The Panel noticed that even using the highest nitrate‐to‐nitrite conversion factor the methaemoglobin levels produced due to nitrite obtained from this conversion would not be clinically significant and would result to a theoretically estimated endogenous N‐nitroso compounds (ENOC) production at levels which would be of low concern. Hence, and despite the uncertainty associated with the ADI established by the SCF, the Panel concluded that currently there was insufficient evidence to withdraw this ADI. The exposure to nitrate solely from its use as a food additive was estimated to be less than 5% of the overall exposure to nitrate in food based on a refined estimated exposure scenario. This exposure did not exceed the current ADI (SCF, 1997). However, if all sources of exposure to dietary nitrate are considered (food additive, natural presence and contamination), the ADI would be exceeded for all age groups at the mean and the highest exposure.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18314732
Volume :
15
Issue :
6
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
EFSA Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.440b4087e61b4bdd9b537c1582db0858
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4787