Back to Search Start Over

Longitudinal Accuracy of Web-Based Self-Reported Weights: Results From the Hopkins POWER Trial

Authors :
Jerome, Gerald J
Dalcin, Arlene
Coughlin, Janelle W
Fitzpatrick, Stephanie
Wang, Nae-Yuh
Durkin, Nowella
Yeh, Hsin-Chieh
Charleston, Jeanne
Pozefsky, Thomas
Daumit, Gail L
Clark, Jeanne M
Louis, Thomas A
Appel, Lawrence J
Source :
Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol 16, Iss 7, p e173 (2014)
Publication Year :
2014
Publisher :
JMIR Publications, 2014.

Abstract

BackgroundWebsites and phone apps are increasingly used to track weights during weight loss interventions, yet the longitudinal accuracy of these self-reported weights is uncertain. ObjectiveOur goal was to compare the longitudinal accuracy of self-reported weights entered online during the course of a randomized weight loss trial to measurements taken in the clinic. We aimed to determine if accuracy of self-reported weight is associated with weight loss and to determine the extent of misclassification in achieving 5% weight loss when using self-reported compared to clinic weights. MethodsThis study examined the accuracy of self-reported weights recorded online among intervention participants in the Hopkins Practice-Based Opportunities for Weight Reduction (POWER) trial, a randomized trial examining the effectiveness of two lifestyle-based weight loss interventions compared to a control group among obese adult patients with at least one cardiovascular risk factor. One treatment group was offered telephonic coaching and the other group was offered in-person individual coaching and group sessions. All intervention participants (n=277) received a digital scale and were asked to track their weight weekly on a study website. Research staff used a standard protocol to measure weight in the clinic. Differences (self-reported weight – clinic weight) indicate if self-report under (-) or over (+) estimated clinic weight using the self-reported weight that was closest in time to the clinic weight and was within a window ranging from the day of the clinic visit to 7 days before the 6-month (n=225) and 24-month (n=191) clinic visits. The absolute value of the differences (absolute difference) describes the overall accuracy. ResultsUnderestimation of self-reported weights increased significantly from 6 months (mean -0.5kg, SD 1.0kg) to 24 months (mean -1.1kg, SD 2.0kg; P=.002). The average absolute difference also increased from 6 months (mean 0.7kg, SD 0.8kg) to 24 months (mean 1.3, SD 1.8kg; P

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14388871
Volume :
16
Issue :
7
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.4539bf795314dd2ab8588eac414f045
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3332