Back to Search Start Over

Speech and Nonspeech Parameters in the Clinical Assessment of Dysarthria: A Dimensional Analysis

Authors :
Wolfram Ziegler
Theresa Schölderle
Bettina Brendel
Verena Risch
Stefanie Felber
Katharina Ott
Georg Goldenberg
Mathias Vogel
Kai Bötzel
Lena Zettl
Stefan Lorenzl
Renée Lampe
Katrin Strecker
Matthis Synofzik
Tobias Lindig
Hermann Ackermann
Anja Staiger
Source :
Brain Sciences, Vol 13, Iss 1, p 113 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
MDPI AG, 2023.

Abstract

Nonspeech (or paraspeech) parameters are widely used in clinical assessment of speech impairment in persons with dysarthria (PWD). Virtually every standard clinical instrument used in dysarthria diagnostics includes nonspeech parameters, often in considerable numbers. While theoretical considerations have challenged the validity of these measures as markers of speech impairment, only a few studies have directly examined their relationship to speech parameters on a broader scale. This study was designed to investigate how nonspeech parameters commonly used in clinical dysarthria assessment relate to speech characteristics of dysarthria in individuals with movement disorders. Maximum syllable repetition rates, accuracies, and rates of isolated and repetitive nonspeech oral–facial movements and maximum phonation times were compared with auditory–perceptual and acoustic speech parameters. Overall, 23 diagnostic parameters were assessed in a sample of 130 patients with movement disorders of six etiologies. Each variable was standardized for its distribution and for age and sex effects in 130 neurotypical speakers. Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were used to examine the factor structure underlying the diagnostic parameters. In the first analysis, we tested the hypothesis that nonspeech parameters combine with speech parameters within diagnostic dimensions representing domain–general motor control principles. In a second analysis, we tested the more specific hypotheses that diagnostic parameters split along effector (lip vs. tongue) or functional (speed vs. accuracy) rather than task boundaries. Our findings contradict the view that nonspeech parameters currently used in dysarthria diagnostics are congruent with diagnostic measures of speech characteristics in PWD.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20763425 and 61241709
Volume :
13
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Brain Sciences
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.489c8b62d8cd4e55b288c16c61241709
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13010113