Back to Search Start Over

Meta-analysis of the INSIG2 association with obesity including 74,345 individuals: does heterogeneity of estimates relate to study design?

Authors :
Iris M Heid
Cornelia Huth
Ruth J F Loos
Florian Kronenberg
Vera Adamkova
Sonia S Anand
Kristin Ardlie
Heike Biebermann
Peter Bjerregaard
Heiner Boeing
Claude Bouchard
Marina Ciullo
Jackie A Cooper
Dolores Corella
Christian Dina
James C Engert
Eva Fisher
Francesc Francès
Philippe Froguel
Johannes Hebebrand
Robert A Hegele
Anke Hinney
Margret R Hoehe
Frank B Hu
Jaroslav A Hubacek
Steve E Humphries
Steven C Hunt
Thomas Illig
Marjo-Riita Järvelin
Marika Kaakinen
Barbara Kollerits
Heiko Krude
Jitender Kumar
Leslie A Lange
Birgit Langer
Shengxu Li
Andreas Luchner
Helen N Lyon
David Meyre
Karen L Mohlke
Vincent Mooser
Almut Nebel
Thuy Trang Nguyen
Bernhard Paulweber
Louis Perusse
Lu Qi
Tuomo Rankinen
Dieter Rosskopf
Stefan Schreiber
Shantanu Sengupta
Rossella Sorice
Anita Suk
Gudmar Thorleifsson
Unnur Thorsteinsdottir
Henry Völzke
Karani S Vimaleswaran
Nicholas J Wareham
Dawn Waterworth
Salim Yusuf
Cecilia Lindgren
Mark I McCarthy
Christoph Lange
Joel N Hirschhorn
Nan Laird
H-Erich Wichmann
Source :
PLoS Genetics, Vol 5, Iss 10, p e1000694 (2009)
Publication Year :
2009
Publisher :
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2009.

Abstract

The INSIG2 rs7566605 polymorphism was identified for obesity (BMI> or =30 kg/m(2)) in one of the first genome-wide association studies, but replications were inconsistent. We collected statistics from 34 studies (n = 74,345), including general population (GP) studies, population-based studies with subjects selected for conditions related to a better health status ('healthy population', HP), and obesity studies (OB). We tested five hypotheses to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. The meta-analysis of 27 studies on Caucasian adults (n = 66,213) combining the different study designs did not support overall association of the CC-genotype with obesity, yielding an odds ratio (OR) of 1.05 (p-value = 0.27). The I(2) measure of 41% (p-value = 0.015) indicated between-study heterogeneity. Restricting to GP studies resulted in a declined I(2) measure of 11% (p-value = 0.33) and an OR of 1.10 (p-value = 0.015). Regarding the five hypotheses, our data showed (a) some difference between GP and HP studies (p-value = 0.012) and (b) an association in extreme comparisons (BMI> or =32.5, 35.0, 37.5, 40.0 kg/m(2) versus BMI

Subjects

Subjects :
Genetics
QH426-470

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15537390 and 15537404
Volume :
5
Issue :
10
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
PLoS Genetics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.48b5ddba957d4effaae19a30092a0bee
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000694