Back to Search Start Over

Food consumption by degree of food processing and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort analysis of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)Research in context

Authors :
Samuel J. Dicken
Christina C. Dahm
Daniel B. Ibsen
Anja Olsen
Anne Tjønneland
Mariem Louati-Hajji
Claire Cadeau
Chloé Marques
Matthias B. Schulze
Franziska Jannasch
Ivan Baldassari
Luca Manfredi
Maria Santucci de Magistris
Maria-Jose Sánchez
Carlota Castro-Espin
Daniel Rodríguez Palacios
Pilar Amiano
Marcela Guevara
Yvonne T. van der Schouw
Jolanda M.A. Boer
W.M. Monique Verschuren
Stephen J. Sharp
Nita G. Forouhi
Nicholas J. Wareham
Eszter P. Vamos
Kiara Chang
Paolo Vineis
Alicia K. Heath
Marc J. Gunter
Geneviève Nicolas
Elisabete Weiderpass
Inge Huybrechts
Rachel L. Batterham
Source :
The Lancet Regional Health. Europe, Vol 46, Iss , Pp 101043- (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2024.

Abstract

Summary: Background: It is unknown whether the association between ultra-processed food (UPF) intake and type 2 diabetes mellitus differs from other degrees of food processing. We examined the association between degree of food processing and incident type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: This was a prospective cohort analysis of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Dietary intake was assessed at baseline using dietary questionnaires and classified according to the Nova classification into unprocessed/minimally processed food (MPF), processed culinary ingredients (PCI), processed food (PF) and UPF. Type 2 diabetes mellitus cases were verified through multiple methods. Cox regression and statistical substitution analysis was used to estimate associations between MPF + PCI, PF and UPF intake and incident type 2 diabetes mellitus. To investigate heterogeneity in the association between UPF and incident type 2 diabetes mellitus, UPF sub-group analysis was conducted. Different reference groups were used in each analysis. Findings: Over an average 10.9 years follow-up of 311,892 individuals, 14,236 type 2 diabetes mellitus cases were identified. Each 10% increment of total daily food intake from UPF (%g/day) was associated with 17% (95% confidence interval (95%CI): 1.14–1.19) higher incident type 2 diabetes mellitus. Each 10% increment in MPF + PCI or PF intake was associated with lower incident type 2 diabetes mellitus (MPF + PCI hazard ratio: 0.94 (95%CI: 0.92–0.96); PF hazard ratio: 0.92 (95%CI: 0.89–0.95)). Replacing UPF with MPF + PCI or PF was associated with lower incident type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, heterogeneity was observed across UPF sub-groups, with breads, biscuits and breakfast cereals, sweets and desserts, and plant-based alternatives associated with lower incident type 2 diabetes mellitus. Interpretation: These findings support recommendations to focus on reducing intake of specific UPF for lowering type 2 diabetes mellitus risk. Funding: International Agency for Research on Cancer.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
26667762
Volume :
46
Issue :
101043-
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
The Lancet Regional Health. Europe
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.4aa088a8f2b9484fb8e5247b66d1fcb0
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101043