Back to Search Start Over

Italian standardization of the BPSD-SINDEM scale for the assessment of neuropsychiatric symptoms in persons with dementia

Authors :
Federico Emanuele Pozzi
Fabrizia D'Antonio
Marta Zuffi
Oriana Pelati
Davide Vernè
Massimiliano Panigutti
Margherita Alberoni
Maria Grazia Di Maggio
Alfredo Costa
Sindem BPSD Study Group
Lucio Tremolizzo
Elisabetta Farina
Allegri Nicola
Appollonio Ildebrando
Badiali Vanessa
Borsani Carolina
Francesca Caso Giuseppe Bruno
Castiglioni Stefania
Canevelli Marco
Ramusino Matteo Cotta
Ferrarese Carlo
Gaillet Angelo Giovanni
Imbimbo Camillo
Solano Jorge Navarro
Magnani Giuseppe
Manfredi Luigi Giovanni
Marra Camillo
Milia Antonio
Negro Giulia
Perini Giulia
Poloni Tino Emanuele
Pomati Simone
Quaranta Davide
Scanu Lucia
Monti Micaela Sepe
Tentorio Tiziana
Source :
Frontiers in Neurology, Vol 15 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Frontiers Media S.A., 2024.

Abstract

IntroductionBehavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD) are a heterogeneous set of psychological reactions and abnormal behaviors in people with dementia (PwD). Current assessment tools, like the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), only rely on caregiver assessment of BPSD and are therefore prone to bias.Materials and methodsA multidisciplinary team developed the BPSD-SINDEM scale as a three-part instrument, with two questionnaires administered to the caregiver (evaluating BPSD extent and caregiver distress) and a clinician-rated observational scale. This first instrument was tested on a sample of 33 dyads of PwD and their caregivers, and the results were qualitatively appraised in order to revise the tool through a modified Delphi method. During this phase, the wording of the questions was slightly changed, and the distress scale was changed into a coping scale based on the high correlation between extent and distress (r = 0.94). The final version consisted of three 17-item subscales, evaluating BPSD extent and caregiver coping, and the unchanged clinician-rated observational scale.ResultsThis tool was quantitatively validated in a sample of 208 dyads. It demonstrated good concurrent validity, with the extent subscale correlating positively with NPI scores (r = 0.64, p

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16642295
Volume :
15
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Frontiers in Neurology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.4bac488964bf44cabfe8825603d8c3be
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1455787