Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole versus levofloxacin for the treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections: A multicentre cohort study

Background: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) has long been considered the treatment of choice for infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Levofloxacin has emerged as a potential option for treating these infections. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes in patients who received TMP-SMX versus levofloxacin for treating S. maltophilia infections. Methods: A retrospective, cohort study was conducted in 4 tertiary centres and included patients who were treated with either TMP-SMX or levofloxacin for infections caused by S. maltophilia. The main study outcomes were overall in-hospital mortality, 30-d mortality, and clinical cure. Safety outcomes were also evaluated. Multivariate analysis using logistic regression was used to control for the effect of the covariables. Results: We included 371 patients in this study, 316 received TMP-SMX and 55 patients received levofloxacin. A total of 70% were in the intensive care unit and 21% presented with bacteraemia. No statistically significant differences were observed in overall in-hospital mortality (52% vs. 40%; P = 0.113; odd ratio [OR], 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89–2.86), 30-d mortality (28% vs. 25%; P = 0.712; OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.59–2.18), or clinical cure (55% vs. 64%; P = 0.237; OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.37–1.31). Rates of acute kidney injury were comparable between the two groups (11% vs. 7%; P = 0.413). Conclusion: Patients receiving levofloxacin for the treatment of infections caused by S. maltophilia demonstrated clinical outcomes similar to those receiving TMP-SMX. Our study suggests that levofloxacin can be a reasonable alternative to TMP-SMX to treat these infections.