Relationship between Hand Bone Mineral Density and Functionality in Patients with Traumatic Hand Injury

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a difference in hand bone mineral density (BMD) between patients with traumatic hand injuries and healthy volunteers during the immobilization process, as well as to examine the change in BMD during follow-up and the effect of denervation on BMD. In addition, we aimed to compare the BMD in the dominant and nondominant hands. Methods: The study involved patients aged 18–55 years who had undergone surgery for hand tendon injuries (TIs), with or without accompanying nerve injury, and subsequently sought rehabilitation at our outpatient clinic. The study groups were comprised patients with TI, those with tendon and nerve injury (TNI), and healthy volunteers. Results: The study examined 24 patients with TI, 23 with TNI, and 31 healthy volunteers. In the healthy control group, the BMD of the dominant hand was significantly higher than that of the nondominant hand (P < 0.001). At 4 weeks, there was no significant decrease in BMD observed in the TI and TNI groups compared to controls (P > 0.05). However, at the 4th month, both groups showed a significant decrease in BMD, with the TNI group exhibiting higher changes (P < 0.05). Injuries to the dominant hand did not result in significant changes in BMD at 4 weeks and 4 months (P > 0.05). However, a significant decrease in BMD was observed in injuries to the nondominant hand compared to controls at 4 months (P < 0.05). Notably, nondominant hand TNI patients experienced a significant reduction in BMD during the 4th month compared to the 4th week (P < 0.05). In addition, a significant correlation (r = 0.567) was found between grip strength and BMD value in the 4th month of patients with hand injuries. Conclusion: In patients with traumatic hand injuries, nondominant hand injury and/or nerve injury may lead to a decrease in BMD in addition to immobilization.