Back to Search Start Over

'We’re sinking': a qualitative interview-based study on stakeholder perceptions of structural and process limitations to the Canadian healthcare system

Authors :
Jeanna Parsons Leigh
Stephana Julia Moss
Sara J. Mizen
Cynthia Sriskandarajah
Emily A. FitzGerald
Amity E. Quinn
Fiona Clement
Brenlea Farkas
Alexandra Dodds
Melanie Columbus
Henry T. Stelfox
Source :
Archives of Public Health, Vol 82, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
BMC, 2024.

Abstract

Abstract Background Despite longstanding efforts and calls for reform, Canada’s incremental approach to healthcare changes has left the country lagging behind other OECD nations. Reform to the Canadian healthcare system is essential to develop a higher performing system. This study sought to gain a deeper understanding of the views of Canadian stakeholders on structural and process deficiencies and strategies to improve the Canadian healthcare system substantially and meaningfully. Methods We conducted individual, ~ 45-minute, semi-structured virtual interviews from May 2022 to August 2022. Using existing contacts and snowball sampling, we targeted one man and one woman from five regions in Canada across four stakeholder groups: (1) public citizens; (2) healthcare leaders; (3) academics; and (4) political decision makers. Interviews centered on participants’ perceptions of the state of the current healthcare system, including areas where major improvements are required, and strategies to achieve suggested enhancements; Donabedian’s Model (i.e., structure, process, outcomes) was the guiding conceptual framework. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and de-identified, and inductive thematic analysis was performed independently and in duplicate according to published methods. Results The data from 31 interviews with 13 (41.9%) public citizens, 10 (32.3%) healthcare leaders, 4 (12.9%) academics, and 4 (12.9%) political decision makers resulted in three themes related to the structure of the healthcare system (1. system reactivity; 2. linkage with the Canadian identity; and 3. political and funding structures), three themes related to healthcare processes (1. staffing shortages; 2. inefficient care; and 3. inconsistent care), and three strategies to improve short- and long-term population health outcomes (1. delineating roles and revising incentives; 2. enhanced health literacy; 3. interdisciplinary and patient-centred care). Conclusion Canadians in our sample identified important structural and process limitations to the Canadian healthcare system. Meaningful reforms are needed and will require addressing the link between the Canadian identity and our healthcare system to facilitate effective development and implementation of strategies to improve population health outcomes.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20493258
Volume :
82
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Archives of Public Health
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.5a2d7e3c466f4a66a1325e4bed1dcb81
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-024-01279-4