Back to Search Start Over

Statement on the validity of the conclusions of a mouse carcinogenicity study on sucralose (E 955) performed by the Ramazzini Institute

Authors :
EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS)
Fernando Aguilar
Riccardo Crebelli
Alessandro Di Domenico
Birgit Dusemund
Maria Jose Frutos
Pierre Galtier
David Gott
Ursula Gundert‐Remy
Claude Lambré
Jean‐Charles Leblanc
Oliver Lindtner
Peter Moldeus
Pasquale Mosesso
Dominique Parent‐Massin
Agneta Oskarsson
Ivan Stankovic
Ine Waalkens‐Berendsen
Rudolf Antonius Woutersen
Matthew Wright
Maged Younes
Laura Ciccolallo
Paolo Colombo
Federica Lodi
Alicja Mortensen
Source :
EFSA Journal, Vol 15, Iss 5, Pp n/a-n/a (2017)
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
Wiley, 2017.

Abstract

Abstract The Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) was requested from the European Commission to provide a statement on the validity of the conclusions of a mouse study on the carcinogenic potential of sucralose (E 955) performed by the Ramazzini Institute (Soffritti et al., ). Sucralose (E 955) is authorised as a food additive in the EU in accordance with Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 on food additives. According to Commission Regulation (EU) No 257/2010, the full re‐evaluation of sucralose shall be completed by December 2020. Taking into consideration the publication from Soffritti et al. (), the technical report and additional information provided by the Ramazzini Institute and other information available for sucralose (E 955), the Panel noted: (i) the design of the bioassay that considers exposure from gestation up to natural death of animals implies an increase in background pathology that results in the possibility of misclassifications and a difficult interpretation of data, especially in the absence of both an appropriate concurrent control group and a recent historical database; (ii) the lack of a dose–response relationship between the exposure to sucralose and incidence of lymphomas and leukaemias (combined); (iii) the lack of a mode of action and failure to meet all the Bradford‐Hill considerations for a cause–effect relationship between intake of sucralose and the development of tumours in male mice only; (iv) a comprehensive database was available for sucralose and no carcinogenic effect was reported in adequate studies in rats and mice. Moreover, there was no reliable evidence of in vivo genotoxicity. Therefore, the Panel concluded that the available data did not support the conclusions of the authors (Soffritti et al., ) that sucralose induced haematopoietic neoplasias in male Swiss mice.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18314732
Volume :
15
Issue :
5
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
EFSA Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.5c720da2ee404c979b795eab9108b046
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4784