Back to Search Start Over

Second- and third-line treatment strategies in multiple myeloma: a referral-center experience

Authors :
Sarah Goldman-Mazur
Alissa Visram
S. Vincent Rajkumar
Prashant Kapoor
Angela Dispenzieri
Martha Q. Lacy
Morie A. Gertz
Francis K. Buadi
Suzanne R. Hayman
David Dingli
Taxiarchis Kourelis
Wilson Gonsalves
Rahma Warsame
Eli Muchtar
Nelson Leung
Robert A. Kyle
Shaji K. Kumar
Source :
Blood Cancer Journal, Vol 12, Iss 12, Pp 1-6 (2022)
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Nature Publishing Group, 2022.

Abstract

Abstract The treatment landscape for relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) has increased. In this study, we aimed to characterize 2nd (n = 1439) and 3rd (n = 1104) line regimens and compare the results between subgroups based on the year of treatment initiation (2nd line: 2003–2008, 2009–2015, 2016–2021; 3rd line: 2004–2009, 2010–2015, and 2016–2021). In both the second- and third- lines, we observed increasing use of novel agents (from 78 to 95% and from 77 to 95%, respectively) and triplet regimens (from 15 to 69% and from 21 to 71%, respectively). The most frequently used regimens in the last studied periods included lenalidomide-dexamethasone (RD; 14%), carfilzomib-RD (12%), and daratumumab-RD (10%) for the second-line, and daratumumab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone (11%) and daratumumab-RD (10%) for the third-line. The median time to the next treatment from second-line therapy has improved from 10.4 months (95% CI: 8.4–12.4) to 16.6 months (95% CI: 13.3–20.3; p

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20445385
Volume :
12
Issue :
12
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Blood Cancer Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.5e9ecee209e245c3b66b41676099aaf1
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-022-00757-8