Back to Search Start Over

Galantamine plasma concentration and cognitive response in Alzheimer’s disease

Authors :
Yi-Ting Lin
Mei-Chuan Chou
Shyh-Jong Wu
Yuan-Han Yang
Source :
PeerJ, Vol 7, p e6887 (2019)
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
PeerJ Inc., 2019.

Abstract

Background Galantamine has been approved for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, there are few studies which have reported the association between cognitive responses and galantamine plasma concentration. The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between galantamine plasma concentration and the subsequent cognitive response following treatment in AD patients. Methods AD sufferers who continuously took 8 mg/d galantamine for at least 6 months without previous exposure to other kinds of AChEI such as donepezil, rivastigmine, or memantine were included in this cohort study. The assessments included the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE), Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) and the Cognitive Assessment Screening Instrument (CASI). Each subdomain of the CASI assessment was conducted at baseline and after 6 months of galantamine. The plasma concentrations of galantamine were measured by capillary electrophoresis after 6 months of the treatment. Logistic regression was performed to adjust for age, gender, apolipoprotein E ε4 genotype status, and baseline score to investigate the association between galantamine plasma concentrations and the cognitive response. Results The total sample consisted of 33 clinically diagnosed AD patients taking galantamine 8 mg/d for 6 months. There was no linear correlation between galantamine concentration and cognitive response in patients. However, 22 patients were responsive to the treatment in the long-term memory domain. In CASI subset domain, concentration improved during the 6 months follow up. Conclusions In the limited samples study, galantamine mostly benefitted the cognitive domain of long-term memory. The benefits were not related to the galantamine plasma concentration. Objective intra-individual evaluation of therapeutic response should be encouraged.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
21678359
Volume :
7
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
PeerJ
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.5f02744037f4013bd49d9408e264349
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6887