Back to Search Start Over

Defining common criteria for harmonizing life cycle assessments of livestock systems

Authors :
Pietro Goglio
Marie Trydeman Knudsen
Klara Van Mierlo
Nina Röhrig
Maxime Fossey
Alberto Maresca
Fatemeh Hashemi
Muhammad Ahmed Waqas
Jenny Yngvesson
Gilles Nassy
Roline Broekema
Simon Moakes
Catherine Pfeifer
Robert Borek
David Yanez-Ruiz
Monica Quevedo Cascante
Alina Syp
Tomasz Zylowsky
Manuel Romero-Huelva
Laurence G. Smith
Source :
Cleaner Production Letters, Vol 4, Iss , Pp 100035- (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2023.

Abstract

Animal production intensification puts pressure on resources, leads to environmental impacts, animal welfare and biodiversity issues. Livestock products provide key components of the human diet and contribute to rural territories through ecosystem services such as nutrient and biomass recycling. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is key to assess environmental impacts in livestock systems and products. A harmonization of LCA methods is necessary to improve evaluations in these areas as LCA still lacks accuracy and robustness in addressing sustainability across livestock systems and products. Here, a participatory harmonization approach was applied to provide a framework to evaluate LCAs of current and future livestock systems. A total of 29 workshops with targeted discussions among 21 LCA experts were organised, together with two anonymous surveys to harmonise evaluation criteria. First, key research topics for improving LCAs of livestock systems were identified as follows: i) Food, feed, fuel and biomaterial competition, crop-livestock interaction and the circular economy; ii) Biodiversity; iii) Animal welfare; iv) Nutrition; v) GHG emissions. Next, general evaluation criteria were identified for livestock focussed LCA methods, considering livestock systems characteristics: Transparency and Reproducibility, Completeness, Fairness and Acceptance, Robustness and Accuracy. Evaluation criteria specific to each key topic were also identified. This participatory method was successful in narrowing down general and specific evaluation criteria through targeted discussion. Moreover, this study provided a holistic participatory framework for the evaluation of LCA methods addressing the impacts of livestock systems across a range of key topics which can be further used for other sectors.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
26667916
Volume :
4
Issue :
100035-
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Cleaner Production Letters
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.5f5bbb36310444982478e538d4a4a6d
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100035