Back to Search Start Over

Finnish study of intraoperative irrigation versus drain alone after evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma (FINISH): a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

Authors :
Jonas Ranstam
Ville Leinonen
Rahul Raj
Simo Taimela
Kimmo Lönnrot
Janek Frantzen
Teppo Jarvinen
Jarno Satopää
Pihla Tommiska
Christoph Schwartz
Riku Kivisaari
T Luostarinen
Jussi Posti
Teemu M Luoto
Sami Tetri
Timo Koivisto
Source :
BMJ Open, Vol 10, Iss 6 (2020)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
BMJ Publishing Group, 2020.

Abstract

Introduction Chronic subdural haematomas (CSDHs) are one of the most common neurosurgical conditions. The goal of surgery is to alleviate symptoms and minimise the risk of symptomatic recurrences. In the past, reoperation rates as high as 20%–30% were described for CSDH recurrences. However, following the introduction of subdural drainage, reoperation rates dropped to approximately 10%. The standard surgical technique includes burr-hole craniostomy, followed by intraoperative irrigation and placement of subdural drainage. Yet, the role of intraoperative irrigation has not been established. If there is no difference in recurrence rates between intraoperative irrigation and no irrigation, CSDH surgery could be carried out faster and more safely by omitting the step of irrigation. The aim of this multicentre randomised controlled trial is to study whether no intraoperative irrigation and subdural drainage results in non-inferior outcome compared with intraoperative irrigation and subdural drainage following burr-hole craniostomy of CSDH.Methods and analysis This is a prospective, randomised, controlled, parallel group, non-inferiority multicentre trial comparing single burr-hole evacuation of CSDH with intraoperative irrigation and evacuation of CSDH without irrigation. In both groups, a passive subdural drain is used for 48 hours as a standard of treatment. The primary outcome is symptomatic CSDH recurrence requiring reoperation within 6 months. The predefined non-inferiority margin for the primary outcome is 7.5%. To achieve a 2.5% level of significance and 80% power, we will randomise 270 patients per group. Secondary outcomes include modified Rankin Scale, rate of mortality, duration of operation, length of hospital stay, adverse events and change in volume of CSDH.Ethics and dissemination The study was approved by the institutional review board of the Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District (HUS/3035/2019 §238) and duly registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. We will disseminate the findings of this study through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.Trial registration number NCT04203550

Subjects

Subjects :
Medicine

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20200382 and 20446055
Volume :
10
Issue :
6
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
BMJ Open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.626f8bd46bf34dd89453ec289c6ac2f1
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038275