Back to Search Start Over

Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement.

Authors :
Malcolm R Macleod
Aaron Lawson McLean
Aikaterini Kyriakopoulou
Stylianos Serghiou
Arno de Wilde
Nicki Sherratt
Theo Hirst
Rachel Hemblade
Zsanett Bahor
Cristina Nunes-Fonseca
Aparna Potluru
Andrew Thomson
Julija Baginskaite
Kieren Egan
Hanna Vesterinen
Gillian L Currie
Leonid Churilov
David W Howells
Emily S Sena
Source :
PLoS Biology, Vol 13, Iss 10, p e1002273 (2015)
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2015.

Abstract

The reliability of experimental findings depends on the rigour of experimental design. Here we show limited reporting of measures to reduce the risk of bias in a random sample of life sciences publications, significantly lower reporting of randomisation in work published in journals of high impact, and very limited reporting of measures to reduce the risk of bias in publications from leading United Kingdom institutions. Ascertainment of differences between institutions might serve both as a measure of research quality and as a tool for institutional efforts to improve research quality.

Subjects

Subjects :
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15449173 and 15457885
Volume :
13
Issue :
10
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
PLoS Biology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.64bd37c7387b4e56912c0232e308d135
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002273