Back to Search Start Over

Clinical spectrum, outcome and management of immune thrombocytopenia associated with myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia

Authors :
Vincent Jachiet
Guillaume Moulis
Jérome Hadjadj
Julie Seguier
Kamel Laribi
Nicolas Schleinitz
Norbert Vey
Karim Sacre
Bertrand Godeau
Odile Beyne-Rauzy
Romain Bouvet
Jonathan Broner
Natacha Brun
Thibault Comont
Clément Gaudin
Olivier Lambotte
Lenaïg Le Clech
Pierre Peterlin
Frédérique Roy-Peaud
Clémentine Salvado
Mathilde Versini
Françoise Isnard
Jean Emmanuel Kahn
Delphine Gobert
Lionel Adès
Pierre Fenaux
Olivier Fain
Arsène Mekinian
Source :
Haematologica, Vol 106, Iss 5 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Ferrata Storti Foundation, 2021.

Abstract

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) are associated with systemic inflammatory or autoimmune diseases in 10-20 % of cases. Among them, immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) has been reported but large studies assessing this association are missing. Whether such patients have a particular phenotype and require particular management is unclear. This study analyzes the clinical spectrum, outcome and therapeutic management of patients with ITP associated with MDS or CMML, in comparison (i) to patients with primary ITP without MDS/CMML and (ii) to patients with MDS/CMML without ITP. Forty-one MDS/CMML-associated ITP patients were included, with chronic ITP in 26 (63%) patients, low-risk myelodysplasia in 30 (73%) patients and CMML in 24 (59%) patients. An associated autoimmune disease was noted in 10 (24%) patients. In comparison to primary ITP patients, MDS/CMML-associated ITP patients had a higher occurrence of severe bleeding despite similar platelet counts at diagnosis. First-line treatment consisted of glucocorticoids (98%) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) (56%). Response achievement with IVIg was more frequent in primary ITP than in MDS/CMML-associated ITP patients. Response rates to second-line therapies were not statistically different between primary ITP and MDS/CMMLassociated ITP patients. Ten percent (n=4) of patients with MDS/CMML-associated ITP had multirefractory ITP versus none in primary ITP controls. After a median follow-up of 60 months, there was no difference in overall survival between MDS/CMML-associated ITP and primary ITP patients. Leukemia-free-survival was significantly better in MDS/CMMLassociated ITP patients than in MDS/CMML without ITP MDS/CMML-associated ITP have a particular outcome with more severe bleeding and multirefractory profile than primary ITP, similar response profile to primary ITP therapy except for IVIg, and less progression toward acute myeloid leukemia than MDS/CMML without ITP.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03906078 and 15928721
Volume :
106
Issue :
5
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Haematologica
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.66d07a3c44536a3a4f28060c3e2c2
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2020.272559