Back to Search Start Over

The Prognostic Value of Total Tumor Volume Response Compared With RECIST1.1 in Patients With Initially Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases Undergoing Systemic Treatment

Authors :
Nina J. Wesdorp, MD
Karen Bolhuis, MD
Joran Roor, MSc
Jan-Hein T. M. van Waesberghe, MD, PhD
Susan van Dieren, MSc, PhD
Martin J. van Amerongen, MD, PhD
Thiery Chapelle, MD, PhD
Cornelis H. C. Dejong, MD, PhD
Marc R. W. Engelbrecht, MD, PhD
Michael F. Gerhards, MD, PhD
Dirk Grunhagen, MD, PhD
Thomas M. van Gulik, MD, PhD
John J. Hermans, MSc, MD, PhD
Koert P. de Jong, MD, PhD
Joost M. Klaase, MD, PhD
Mike S. L. Liem, MD, PhD
Krijn P. van Lienden, MD, PhD
I. Quintus Molenaar, MD, PhD
Gijs A. Patijn, MD, PhD
Arjen M. Rijken, MD, PhD
Theo M. Ruers, MD, PhD
Cornelis Verhoef, MD, PhD
Johannes H. W. de Wilt, MD, PhD
Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg, MD, PhD
Cornelis J. A. Punt, MD, PhD
Joost Huiskens, MD, PhD
Geert Kazemier, MD, PhD
for the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group Liver Expert Panel
Source :
Annals of Surgery Open, Vol 2, Iss 4, p e103 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Wolters Kluwer Health, 2021.

Abstract

Objectives:. Compare total tumor volume (TTV) response after systemic treatment to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST1.1) and assess the prognostic value of TTV change and RECIST1.1 for recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with colorectal liver-only metastases (CRLM). Background:. RECIST1.1 provides unidimensional criteria to evaluate tumor response to systemic therapy. Those criteria are accepted worldwide but are limited by interobserver variability and ignore potentially valuable information about TTV. Methods:. Patients with initially unresectable CRLM receiving systemic treatment from the randomized, controlled CAIRO5 trial (NCT02162563) were included. TTV response was assessed using software specifically developed together with SAS analytics. Baseline and follow-up computed tomography (CT) scans were used to calculate RECIST1.1 and TTV response to systemic therapy. Different thresholds (10%, 20%, 40%) were used to define response of TTV as no standard currently exists. RFS was assessed in a subgroup of patients with secondarily resectable CRLM after induction treatment. Results:. A total of 420 CT scans comprising 7820 CRLM in 210 patients were evaluated. In 30% to 50% (depending on chosen TTV threshold) of patients, discordance was observed between RECIST1.1 and TTV change. A TTV decrease of >40% was observed in 47 (22%) patients who had stable disease according to RECIST1.1. In 118 patients with secondarily resectable CRLM, RFS was shorter for patients with less than 10% TTV decrease compared with patients with more than 10% TTV decrease (P = 0.015), while RECIST1.1 was not prognostic (P = 0.821). Conclusions:. TTV response assessment shows prognostic potential in the evaluation of systemic therapy response in patients with CRLM.

Subjects

Subjects :
Surgery
RD1-811

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
26913593 and 00000000
Volume :
2
Issue :
4
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Annals of Surgery Open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.69dc45286be409c858ca7dfac232cd4
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000103