Back to Search Start Over

Current Treatments for Generalized Pustular Psoriasis: A Narrative Summary of a Systematic Literature Search

Authors :
Lluís Puig
Hideki Fujita
Diamant Thaçi
Min Zheng
Ana Cristina Hernandez Daly
Craig Leonardi
Mark G. Lebwohl
Jonathan Barker
Source :
Dermatology and Therapy, Vol 14, Iss 9, Pp 2331-2378 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Adis, Springer Healthcare, 2024.

Abstract

Abstract Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare, chronic and potentially life-threatening autoinflammatory skin disease characterized by widespread eruption of sterile pustules, with or without systemic inflammation. GPP can significantly reduce patients’ quality of life (QoL). Several therapeutic approaches have been described in the literature, but there is no consensus on optimal treatment. In this review, we summarize published literature on efficacy, safety and QoL outcomes associated with current treatment of GPP with both approved and non-approved products. Embase and MEDLINE databases were searched (1980–September 2023). A search protocol was designed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42021215437). Details on publication, population, intervention, efficacy, safety and QoL were captured and checked by independent reviewers. In total, 118 publications were included, with only 19% of publications reporting on the results of clinical trials. Treatment modalities reported for GPP included non-biologic systemic therapies such as retinoids, cyclosporine and methotrexate, topical agents, biologics and small molecules, among others. Results were highly heterogeneous and methodological quality was very low, with only the interleukin-36R inhibitor spesolimab reporting results from placebo-controlled randomized trials; based on this, spesolimab is now approved for GPP treatment in regions including the USA, Japan, China, the EU and several other countries. Some other biologics are approved exclusively in Japan and Taiwan for the treatment of GPP based on open-label studies with small patient numbers in lieu of double-blind studies. Non-standardization of clinical outcomes across studies remains a major hurdle in reaching a consensus on optimal treatment. However, recently trials have been conducted using well-defined, disease-specific endpoints to evaluate GPP-targeted treatments, which will hopefully advance patient care. In conclusion, this review highlights the need for prospective randomized studies with GPP-specific endpoints to determine the optimal treatment strategy.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
21938210 and 21909172
Volume :
14
Issue :
9
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Dermatology and Therapy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.6a3c54cabc414da3a8ccb8b021e75083
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-024-01230-z