Back to Search Start Over

Phase II trial of eribulin mesylate as a first- or second-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter, single-arm trial

Authors :
Tetsu Hayashida
Hiromitsu Jinno
Katsuaki Mori
Hiroki Sato
Akira Matsui
Takashi Sakurai
Hiroaki Hattori
Shin Takayama
Masahiro Wada
Maiko Takahashi
Hirohito Seki
Tomoko Seki
Aiko Nagayama
Akiko Matsumoto
Yuko Kitagawa
Source :
BMC Cancer, Vol 18, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2018)
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
BMC, 2018.

Abstract

Abstract Background Eribulin mesylate is currently indicated as a sequential monotherapy to be administered after two chemotherapeutic regimens, including anthracycline and taxane treatments, for treatment of metastatic breast cancer. This open-label, multicenter phase II study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eribulin as a first- or second-line treatment for patients with metastatic breast cancer. Methods The primary objective was to determine the overall response rate. Secondary objectives were to evaluate progression-free survival and the safety profile. Patients were scheduled to receive eribulin mesylate 1.4 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Patients received the study treatment unless disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or a request to discontinue from the patient and/or investigator eventuated. Results Between December 2012 and September 2015, 32 patients with metastatic breast cancer were enrolled at 10 participating clinical institutions in Japan, and toxicity and response rates were evaluated. The overall response rate was 43.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 26.5–61.0). The clinical benefit and tumor control rates were 56.3% (95% CI 39.0–73.5) and 78.1% (95% CI 63.8–92.5), respectively. Median progression-free survival was 8.3 months (95% CI 7.1–9.4). A subgroup analysis did not identify any factors affecting the efficacy of eribulin. The most common adverse events were neutropenia (71.9%), alopecia (68.7%), and peripheral neuropathy (46.9%). As a first- or second-line therapy, eribulin showed sufficient efficacy for metastatic breast cancer compared with taxane and capecitabine treatment in previous clinical trials. The safety profile of eribulin was acceptable. Conclusions Eribulin may be another option for first-line chemotherapeutic regimens for metastatic breast cancer. Trial registrations This trial was retrospectively registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trial Registry (ID number: UMIN000010334). Date of trial registration: April 1st, 2013.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14712407
Volume :
18
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
BMC Cancer
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.6ba55bdf97054b9f83708aa53cab456e
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4628-7