Back to Search Start Over

Psychological therapies for post-traumatic stress disorder in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors :
Catrin Lewis
Neil P. Roberts
Martin Andrew
Elise Starling
Jonathan I. Bisson
Source :
European Journal of Psychotraumatology, Vol 11, Iss 1 (2020)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Taylor & Francis Group, 2020.

Abstract

Background: Psychological therapies are the recommended first-line treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Previous systematic reviews have grouped theoretically similar interventions to determine differences between broadly distinct approaches. Consequently, we know little regarding the relative efficacy of the specific manualized therapies commonly applied to the treatment of PTSD. Objective: To determine the effect sizes of manualized therapies for PTSD. Methods: We undertook a systematic review following Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. A pre-determined definition of clinical importance was applied to the results and the quality of evidence was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. Results: 114 randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) of 8171 participants were included. There was robust evidence that the therapies broadly defined as CBT with a trauma focus (CBT-T), as well as Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), had a clinically important effect. The manualized CBT-Ts with the strongest evidence of effect were Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT); Cognitive Therapy (CT); and Prolonged Exposure (PE). There was also some evidence supporting CBT without a trauma focus; group CBT with a trauma focus; guided internet-based CBT; and Present Centred Therapy (PCT). There was emerging evidence for a number of other therapies. Conclusions: A recent increase in RCTs of psychological therapies for PTSD, results in a more confident recommendation of CBT-T and EMDR as the first-line treatments. Among the CBT-Ts considered by the review CPT, CT and PE should be the treatments of choice. The findings should guide evidence informed shared decision-making between patient and clinician.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20008066 and 20008198
Volume :
11
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.6bd469ee82c475dac4daf7578bed545
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2020.1729633