Back to Search
Start Over
Comparison of the lower uterine segment in pregnant women with and without previous cesarean section in 3 T MRI
- Source :
- BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2019)
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- BMC, 2019.
-
Abstract
- Abstract Background Prenatal risk stratification of women with previous cesarean section (CS) by ultrasound thickness measurement of the lower uterine segment (LUS) is challenging. There is a wide range of proposed cutoff values and a valuable algorithm for selection before birth is not available. Using 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we aimed to identify possible shortcomings of the current protocols used for birth selection after CS. Therefore, we evaluated anatomic and morphologic differences of the LUS and its thickness in patients with CS and those without. Possible impact factors on LUS thickness were studied. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 3 T MRI scans of 164 pregnant women in their second or third trimester, with (patient group, n = 60) and without previous CS (control group, n = 104). Sagittal T2-weighted images were studied. Normal findings of the LUS in MRI, reliability of MRI measurements, as well as factors influencing LUS thickness were assessed. MRI findings were compared to intraoperative findings. Results MRI provided good intra- (ICC 0.872) and fair inter-rater reliability (ICC 0.643). The relationship of the LUS and the cesarean scar to the surrounding anatomical structures and also its morphology varied strongly in patients and controls. Scar identification was possible in only 9/60 (15.0%) patients. The LUS was thinner in patients (1.9 ± 0.7 mm) than in controls (2.7 ± 1.3 mm). An LUS thinning up to 1 mm was observed in 23% of women without a previous CS and in 34% of women with normal intraoperative findings. Suspicion of a uterine dehiscence (LUS thickness
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 14712393
- Volume :
- 19
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- Directory of Open Access Journals
- Journal :
- BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- edsdoj.6c267450589d4144bdab607f34b63c9b
- Document Type :
- article
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2314-7