Back to Search Start Over

Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial to assess safety of teleconsultation compared with face-to-face consultation: the ECASeT study

Authors :
Alejandro Rodríguez-Molinero
Gerard Carot-Sans
Roser Escrig
Cristian Tebé
Jacobo Arce
Carlos Pérez-López
Silvia Ballesta
Guillermo Verdejo
Ángel Cedeño
Mar Riera-Pagespetit
Sofia Vivas-Angeles
Jose L. Alarcon
Itziar Navarro
Silvia Toro
Llorenç Mateo
Ana J. Torres
Gerard Delmás
Helena Camell
Antonio Chamero
Montse Gasol
Jordi Piera-Jiménez
ECASeT Research Group
Source :
Trials, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
BMC, 2023.

Abstract

Abstract Background The use of remote consultation modalities has exponentially grown in the past few years, particularly since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Although a huge body of the literature has described the use of phone (tele) and video consultations, very few of the studies correspond to randomized controlled trials, and none of them has assessed the safety of these consultation modalities as the primary objective. The primary objective of this trial was to assess the safety of remote consultations (both video and teleconsultation) in the follow-up of patients in the hospital setting. Methods Multicenter, randomized controlled trial being conducted in four centers of an administrative healthcare area in Catalonia (North-East Spain). Participants will be screened from all individuals, irrespective of age and sex, who require follow-up in outpatient consultations of any of the departments involved in the study. Eligibility criteria have been established based on the local guidelines for screening patients for remote consultation. Participants will be randomly allocated into one of the two study arms: conventional face-to-face consultation (control) and remote consultation, either teleconsultation or video consultation (intervention). Routine follow-up visits will be scheduled at a frequency determined by the physician based on the diagnostic and therapy of the baseline disease (the one triggering enrollment). The primary outcome will be the number of adverse reactions and complications related to the baseline disease. Secondary outcomes will include non-scheduled visits and hospitalizations, as well as usability features of remote consultations. All data will either be recorded in an electronic clinical report form or retrieved from local electronic health records. Based on the complications and adverse reaction rates reported in the literature, we established a target sample size of 1068 participants per arm. Recruitment started in May 2022 and is expected to end in May 2024. Discussion The scarcity of precedents on the assessment of remote consultation modalities using randomized controlled designs challenges making design decisions, including recruitment, selection criteria, and outcome definition, which are discussed in the manuscript. Trial registration NCT05094180. The items of the WHO checklist for trial registration are available in Additional file 1. Registered on 24 November 2021.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17456215
Volume :
24
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Trials
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.6d5542e69c264c4cbd2baa3bf8b235fd
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07679-1