Back to Search Start Over

Methodological guidance for the development of animal welfare mandates in the context of the Farm to Fork Strategy

Authors :
EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW)
Søren Saxmose Nielsen
Julio Alvarez
Dominique Joseph Bicout
Paolo Calistri
Elisabetta Canali
Julian Ashley Drewe
Bruno Garin‐Bastuji
Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas
Christian Gortázar Schmidt
Mette Herskin
Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca
Virginie Michel
Barbara Padalino
Paolo Pasquali
Helen Clare Roberts
Hans Spoolder
Karl Stahl
Antonio Velarde
Arvo Viltrop
Sandra Edwards
Sean Ashe
Denise Candiani
Chiara Fabris
Eliana Lima
Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz
Cristina Rojo Gimeno
Yves Van der Stede
Marika Vitali
Christoph Winckler
Source :
EFSA Journal, Vol 20, Iss 7, Pp n/a-n/a (2022)
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Wiley, 2022.

Abstract

Abstract This document provides methodological guidance developed by the EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare to produce Scientific Opinions in response to mandates received from the European Commission in the context of the Farm to Fork Strategy. The mandates relate to the welfare of (i) animals during transport, (ii) calves, (iii) laying hens, (iv) broilers, (v) pigs, (vi) ducks, geese and quails, and (vii) dairy cows. This guidance was developed in order to define the methods and strategy to be applied for responding to the Terms of Reference (ToRs) of the mandates. The mandates each consist of a set of General ToRs which refer to the husbandry systems used in the production of each animal species or the current transport practices for free moving animals and animals transported in cages, and a set of specific ToRs for which difficulties in ensuring animal welfare have been identified and where specific scenarios are envisaged. Part I of the guidance includes a description of welfare consequences for the animals. Part II includes a new methodology for providing quantitative recommendations regarding animal welfare. The proposed methodology follows the assumption that the effect of an exposure variable (e.g. space allowance) on animal welfare can be quantified by comparing the expression of an animal‐based measure (ABM) under ‘unexposed conditions’ (e.g. unlimited space) and under high exposure (e.g. restrictive conditions). The level of welfare as assessed through this ABM can be quantified for different levels of the exposure variable (e.g. at increasing space allowances) and quantitative recommendations can thus be provided. The final version of the methodological guidance was endorsed for public consultation, which took place between 14 February 2022 and 31 March 2022. The comments received are integrated in this document.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18314732
Volume :
20
Issue :
7
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
EFSA Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.710a579b014ec49d15ee49229ec498
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7403