Back to Search Start Over

Predictors and outcomes of withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments in intensive care units in Singapore: a multicentre observational study

Authors :
Clare Fong
Wern Lunn Kueh
Sennen Jin Wen Lew
Benjamin Choon Heng Ho
Yu-Lin Wong
Yie Hui Lau
Yew Woon Chia
Hui Ling Tan
Ying Hao Christopher Seet
Wen Ting Siow
Graeme MacLaren
Rohit Agrawal
Tian Jin Lim
Shir Lynn Lim
Toon Wei Lim
Vui Kian Ho
Chai Rick Soh
Duu Wen Sewa
Chian Min Loo
Faheem Ahmed Khan
Chee Keat Tan
Roshni Sadashiv Gokhale
Chuin Siau
Noelle Louise Siew Hua Lim
Chik-Foo Yim
Jonathen Venkatachalam
Kumaresh Venkatesan
Naville Chi Hock Chia
Mei Fong Liew
Guihong Li
Li Li
Su Mon Myat
Zena Zena
Shuling Zhuo
Ling Ling Yueh
Caroline Shu Fang Tan
Jing Ma
Siew Lian Yeo
Yiong Huak Chan
Jason Phua
for SICM-NICER group
Source :
Journal of Intensive Care, Vol 12, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
BMC, 2024.

Abstract

Abstract Background Clinical practice guidelines on limitation of life-sustaining treatments (LST) in the intensive care unit (ICU), in the form of withholding or withdrawal of LST, state that there is no ethical difference between the two. Such statements are not uniformly accepted worldwide, and there are few studies on LST limitation in Asia. This study aimed to evaluate the predictors and outcomes of withholding and withdrawal of LST in Singapore, focusing on the similarities and differences between the two approaches. Methods This was a multicentre observational study of patients admitted to 21 adult ICUs across 9 public hospitals in Singapore over an average of three months per year from 2014 to 2019. The primary outcome measures were withholding and withdrawal of LST (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, invasive mechanical ventilation, and vasopressors/inotropes). The secondary outcome measure was hospital mortality. Multivariable generalised mixed model analysis was used to identify independent predictors for withdrawal and withholding of LST and if LST limitation predicts hospital mortality. Results There were 8907 patients and 9723 admissions. Of the former, 80.8% had no limitation of LST, 13.0% had LST withheld, and 6.2% had LST withdrawn. Common independent predictors for withholding and withdrawal were increasing age, absence of chronic kidney dialysis, greater dependence in activities of daily living, cardiopulmonary resuscitation before ICU admission, higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, and higher level of care in the first 24 h of ICU admission. Additional predictors for withholding included being of Chinese race, the religions of Hinduism and Islam, malignancy, and chronic liver failure. The additional predictor for withdrawal was lower hospital paying class (with greater government subsidy for hospital bills). Hospital mortality in patients without LST limitation, with LST withholding, and with LST withdrawal was 10.6%, 82.1%, and 91.8%, respectively (p

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20520492
Volume :
12
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Journal of Intensive Care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.717bfb5357b344e88afcf56276b0892e
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-024-00725-3