Back to Search Start Over

Assessing physicians’ and nurses’ experience of dying and death in the ICU: development of the CAESAR-P and the CAESAR-N instruments

Authors :
Florence Boissier
Valérie Seegers
Amélie Seguin
Stéphane Legriel
Alain Cariou
Samir Jaber
Jean-Yves Lefrant
Thomas Rimmelé
Anne Renault
Isabelle Vinatier
Armelle Mathonnet
Danielle Reuter
Olivier Guisset
Christophe Cracco
Jacques Durand-Gasselin
Béatrice Éon
Marina Thirion
Jean-Philippe Rigaud
Bénédicte Philippon-Jouve
Laurent Argaud
Renaud Chouquer
Laurent Papazian
Céline Dedrie
Hugues Georges
Eddy Lebas
Nathalie Rolin
Pierre-Edouard Bollaert
Lucien Lecuyer
Gérald Viquesnel
Marc Leone
Ludivine Chalumeau-Lemoine
Maité Garrouste-Orgeas
Elie Azoulay
Nancy Kentish-Barnes
Source :
Critical Care, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2020)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
BMC, 2020.

Abstract

Abstract Background As an increasing number of deaths occur in the intensive care unit (ICU), studies have sought to describe, understand, and improve end-of-life care in this setting. Most of these studies are centered on the patient’s and/or the relatives’ experience. Our study aimed to develop an instrument designed to assess the experience of physicians and nurses of patients who died in the ICU, using a mixed methodology and validated in a prospective multicenter study. Methods Physicians and nurses of patients who died in 41 ICUs completed the job strain and the CAESAR questionnaire within 24 h after the death. The psychometric validation was conducted using two datasets: a learning and a reliability cohort. Results Among the 475 patients included in the main cohort, 398 nurse and 417 physician scores were analyzed. The global score was high for both nurses [62/75 (59; 66)] and physicians [64/75 (61; 68)]. Factors associated with higher CAESAR-Nurse scores were absence of conflict with physicians, pain control handled with physicians, death disclosed to the family at the bedside, and invasive care not performed. As assessed by the job strain instrument, low decision control was associated with lower CAESAR score (61 (58; 65) versus 63 (60; 67), p = 0.002). Factors associated with higher CAESAR-Physician scores were room dedicated to family information, information delivered together by nurse and physician, families systematically informed of the EOL decision, involvement of the nurse during implementation of the EOL decision, and open visitation. They were also higher when a decision to withdraw or withhold treatment was made, no cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed, and the death was disclosed to the family at the bedside. Conclusion We described and validated a new instrument for assessing the experience of physicians and nurses involved in EOL in the ICU. This study shows important areas for improving practices.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13648535
Volume :
24
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Critical Care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.732f5a3787584a03b392797b153d93f8
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03191-z