Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools

MLA

Stephanie M. Eick, et al. “Assessing Risk of Bias in Human Environmental Epidemiology Studies Using Three Tools: Different Conclusions from Different Tools.” Systematic Reviews, vol. 9, no. 1, Oct. 2020, pp. 1–13. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01490-8.

APA

Stephanie M. Eick, Dana E. Goin, Nicholas Chartres, Juleen Lam, & Tracey J. Woodruff. (2020). Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools. Systematic Reviews, 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01490-8

Chicago

Stephanie M. Eick, Dana E. Goin, Nicholas Chartres, Juleen Lam, and Tracey J. Woodruff. 2020. “Assessing Risk of Bias in Human Environmental Epidemiology Studies Using Three Tools: Different Conclusions from Different Tools.” Systematic Reviews 9 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1186/s13643-020-01490-8.