Back to Search Start Over

Semi-Automatic Tracking of Laser Speckle Contrast Images of Microcirculation in Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Authors :
Onno A. Mennes
Mark Selles
Jaap J. van Netten
Jeff G. van Baal
Wiendelt Steenbergen
Riemer H. J. A. Slart
Source :
Diagnostics, Vol 10, Iss 12, p 1054 (2020)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
MDPI AG, 2020.

Abstract

Foot ulcers are a severe complication of diabetes mellitus. Assessment of the vascular status of diabetic foot ulcers with Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI) is a promising approach for diagnosis and prognosis. However, manual assessment during analysis of LSCI limits clinical applicability. Our aim was to develop and validate a fast and robust tracking algorithm for semi-automatic analysis of LSCI data. The feet of 33 participants with diabetic foot ulcers were recorded with LSCI, including at baseline, during the Post-Occlusive Reactive Hyperemia (PORH) test, and during the Buerger’s test. Different regions of interest (ROIs) were used to measure microcirculation in different areas of the foot. A tracking algorithm was developed in MATLAB to reposition the ROIs in the LSCI scans. Manual- and algorithm-tracking of all recordings were compared by calculating the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). The algorithm was faster in comparison with the manual approach (90 s vs. 15 min). Agreement between manual- and algorithm-tracking was good to excellent during baseline (ICC = 0.896–0.984; p < 0.001), the PORH test (ICC = 0.790–0.960; p < 0.001), and the Buerger’s test (ICC = 0.851–0.978; p < 0.001), resulting in a tracking algorithm that delivers assessment of LSCI in diabetic foot ulcers with results comparable to a labor-intensive manual approach, but with a 10-fold workload reduction.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20754418
Volume :
10
Issue :
12
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Diagnostics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.74f989ca8b0147bcbe2c7dd287179f95
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10121054