Back to Search Start Over

Assessment of safety and feasibility of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of acute stroke

Authors :
Ethem Murat Arsava
Mehmet Akif Topcuoglu
Ilknur Ay
Atilla Ozcan Ozdemir
Ibrahim Levent Gungor
Canan Togay Isikay
Bijen Nazliel
Hasan Huseyin Kozak
Serefnur Ozturk
İbrahim Arda Yilmaz
Babur Dora
Hakan Ay
Ali Unal
Tugba Ozel
Mine Hayriye Sorgun
Eda Aslanbaba Bahadır
Elif Peker
Ozlem Aykac
Zaur Mehdiyev
Hale Zeynep Batur Caglayan
Asli Akyol Gurses
Mehmet Yasir Pektezel
Ezgi Yilmaz
Dogan Dinc Oge
Safak Parlak
Ahmet Bugrul
Hilal Ozguner
Aysu Cetiner Seker
Gokhan Ozdemir
Gozde Ongun
Sueda Ecem Yilmaz
Cihat Ozguncu
Saziye Melike Turan Isik
Omer Faruk Ildiz
Azer Mammadli
Aydin Talip Yildogan
Candace McClure
Source :
Brain Stimulation, Vol 15, Iss 6, Pp 1467-1474 (2022)
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2022.

Abstract

Background: Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) using a hand-held stimulator placed on the neck is an FDA-approved treatment for primary headache disorders. The safety of nVNS is unknown in stroke patients. Objective: To assess the safety and feasibility of nVNS for the acute treatment of stroke. Methods: TR-VENUS (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03733431) was a randomized, sham-controlled, open-label, multicenter trial conducted in patients with acute ischemic stroke (IS) or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Patients were randomly assigned to standard-dose nVNS, high-dose nVNS, or sham stimulation. The primary endpoint was a composite safety outcome defined as bradycardia or reduction in mean arterial blood pressure during treatment or progression of neurological or death within 24 h of treatment. The feasibility endpoints were the proportion of eligible subjects receiving nVNS within 6 h of symptom onset and the proportion completing all pre-specified treatment doses. Efficacy assessments included infarct growth from baseline to 24 h after treatment. Results: Sixty-nine patients (61 IS, 8 ICH) completed the study. The composite safety outcome was achieved in 32.0% in sham and 47.7% in nVNS group (p = 0.203). Treatment was initiated in all but two randomized patients. All dosed subjects received 100% of prespecified stimulations. A non-significant reduction in infarct growth was observed in the high-dose nVNS group (184.2% in sham vs. 63.3% in high-dose nVNS; p = 0.109). Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that nVNS may be safe and feasible in the setting of acute stroke. These findings support further development of nVNS as a potential treatment for acute ischemic stroke.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1935861X
Volume :
15
Issue :
6
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Brain Stimulation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.750f1b44b2574437bd68c356e0c39ca5
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2022.10.012