Back to Search Start Over

Effects of sevoflurane and propofol on the development of pneumonia after esophagectomy: a retrospective cohort study

Authors :
Guo-Hua Zhang
Wen Wang
Source :
BMC Anesthesiology, Vol 17, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2017)
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
BMC, 2017.

Abstract

Abstract Background Postoperative pneumonia (PP) is one of the common complications following esophagectomy and associated with poor short- and long-term outcomes. Sevoflurane and propofol, which have inflammatory-modulating effects, are common used general anesthetics. This study aimed to compare the effects of anesthesia with sevoflurane and propofol on the development of PP after esophageal surgery for cancer. Methods The electronic medical records of patients who underwent elective esophagectomy between July 2013 and July 2016 were reviewed. We conducted univariate and multivariate logistics analysis and propensity score matching analysis to compare the effect of sevoflurane and propofol on the incidence of PP and to identify the risk factors for PP after esophagectomy. Results Overall, the incidence of postoperative pneumonia was 9.5%. There was no significant difference in the rates of PP between sevoflurane group and propofol group either before or after propensity score matching (9.6% vs 8.0%, P = 0.606; 7.7% vs 6.4%, P = 0.754, respectively). Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that alcohol use (OR 1.513; 95% CI 1.062–2.156), surgical procedure (Sweet: referent; Ivor-Lewis: OR 1.993; 95% CI 1.190–3.337; Three-incision: OR 1.878; 95% CI 1.296–2.722) and surgeon experience (high-volume: referent; low-volume: OR 1.525; 95% CI 1.090–2.135) were significant risk factors of postoperative pneumonia. Conclusions Sevoflurane did not differ from propofol in terms of affecting the risk of PP development after esophagectomy.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14712253
Volume :
17
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
BMC Anesthesiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.7519c1f2465422fa37265e05e1ec564
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0458-4