Back to Search Start Over

Section 1. EPR-3 versus GINA 2008 Guidelines - Asthma Control and Step 3 Care

Authors :
Jean Bousquet, MD
William W. Busse, MD
Source :
World Allergy Organization Journal, Vol 3, Iss 2, Pp 16-22 (2010)
Publication Year :
2010
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2010.

Abstract

Recent updates to asthma guidelines from the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) and the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (Expert Panel Report 3, EPR-3) share many similarities, reflecting a focus on asthma control based on clinical manifestations of disease and responsiveness to therapy. Both documents build upon the recommendations of former guidelines utilizing evidence-based review of the published literature to revise algorithms for practice. A major difference between the 2 reports is the preferred treatment at Step 3. The GINA guidelines recommend a combination of low-dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) plus long-acting β-agonist (LABA), whereas the EPR-3 advises either monotherapy with medium-dose ICS or the low-dose ICS + LABA combination. Both approaches are supported by clinical experience and Level A evidence. The option of personalized therapy is a point of discussion for future guidelines. Keywords: EPR-3, GINA, asthma, guidelines

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19394551
Volume :
3
Issue :
2
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
World Allergy Organization Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.7549534cee84409a947c07ddb68c8799
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/WOX.0b013e3181cb90c3