Back to Search Start Over

Sexual Dimorphism in the Response of Mercurialis annua to Stress

Authors :
Ezra M. Orlofsky
Giorgi Kozhoridze
Lyudmila Lyubenova
Elena Ostrozhenkova
J. Barbro Winkler
Peter Schröder
Adelbert Bacher
Wolfgang Eisenreich
Micha Guy
Avi Golan-Goldhirsh
Source :
Metabolites, Vol 6, Iss 2, p 13 (2016)
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
MDPI AG, 2016.

Abstract

The research presented stemmed from the observations that female plants of the annual dioecious Mercurialis annua outlive male plants. This led to the hypothesis that female plants of M. annua would be more tolerant to stress than male plants. This hypothesis was addressed in a comprehensive way, by comparing morphological, biochemical and metabolomics changes in female and male plants during their development and under salinity. There were practically no differences between the genders in vegetative development and physiological parameters. However, under salinity conditions, female plants produced significantly more new reproductive nodes. Gender-linked differences in peroxidase (POD) and glutathione transferases (GSTs) were involved in anti-oxidation, detoxification and developmental processes in M. annua. 1H NMR metabolite profiling of female and male M. annua plants showed that under salinity the activity of the TCA cycle increased. There was also an increase in betaine in both genders, which may be explainable by its osmo-compatible function under salinity. The concentration of ten metabolites changed in both genders, while ‘Female-only-response’ to salinity was detected for five metabolites. In conclusion, dimorphic responses of M. annua plant genders to stress may be attributed to female plants’ capacity to survive and complete the reproductive life cycle.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
22181989
Volume :
6
Issue :
2
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Metabolites
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.772e6079a14c436394fb8499395aa3b8
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo6020013