Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of Technologies for CO2 Capture from Cement Production—Part 2: Cost Analysis

Authors :
Stefania Osk Gardarsdottir
Edoardo De Lena
Matteo Romano
Simon Roussanaly
Mari Voldsund
José-Francisco Pérez-Calvo
David Berstad
Chao Fu
Rahul Anantharaman
Daniel Sutter
Matteo Gazzani
Marco Mazzotti
Giovanni Cinti
Source :
Energies, Vol 12, Iss 3, p 542 (2019)
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
MDPI AG, 2019.

Abstract

This paper presents an assessment of the cost performance of CO2 capture technologies when retrofitted to a cement plant: MEA-based absorption, oxyfuel, chilled ammonia-based absorption (Chilled Ammonia Process), membrane-assisted CO2 liquefaction, and calcium looping. While the technical basis for this study is presented in Part 1 of this paper series, this work presents a comprehensive techno-economic analysis of these CO2 capture technologies based on a capital and operating costs evaluation for retrofit in a cement plant. The cost of the cement plant product, clinker, is shown to increase with 49 to 92% compared to the cost of clinker without capture. The cost of CO2 avoided is between 42 €/tCO2 (for the oxyfuel-based capture process) and 84 €/tCO2 (for the membrane-based assisted liquefaction capture process), while the reference MEA-based absorption capture technology has a cost of 80 €/tCO2. Notably, the cost figures depend strongly on factors such as steam source, electricity mix, electricity price, fuel price and plant-specific characteristics. Hence, this confirms the conclusion of the technical evaluation in Part 1 that for final selection of CO2 capture technology at a specific plant, a plant-specific techno-economic evaluation should be performed, also considering more practical considerations.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19961073
Volume :
12
Issue :
3
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Energies
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.78d7690b9880452baeba5aeddb952a04
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/en12030542