Back to Search Start Over

Heterogeneous estrogen receptor expression in circulating tumor cells suggests diverse mechanisms of fulvestrant resistance

Authors :
Costanza Paoletti
Jose M. Larios
Maria C. Muñiz
Kimberly Aung
Emily M. Cannell
Elizabeth P. Darga
Kelley M. Kidwell
Dafydd G. Thomas
Nahomi Tokudome
Martha E. Brown
Mark C. Connelly
David A. Chianese
Anne F. Schott
N. Lynn Henry
James M. Rae
Daniel F. Hayes
Source :
Molecular Oncology, Vol 10, Iss 7, Pp 1078-1085 (2016)
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
Wiley, 2016.

Abstract

Fulvestrant is a dose dependent selective estrogen receptor (ER) down‐regulator (SERD) used in ER‐positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Nearly all patients develop resistance. We performed molecular analysis of circulating tumor cells (CTC) to gain insight into fulvestrant resistance. Preclinical studies were performed with cultured breast cancer cells spiked into human blood and analyzed on the CellSearch® system. Clinical data are limited to a subset of patients with ER‐positive MBC from a previously reported pilot trial whose disease was progressing on fulvestrant (N = 7) or aromatase inhibitors (AIs) (N = 10). CTCs were enumerated and phenotyped for ER and B‐cell lymphoma (BCL2) using the CellSearch® CXC kit. In preclinical modeling, tamoxifen and AIs resulted in stabilized ER expression, whereas fulvestrant eliminated it. Five of seven patients progressing on fulvestrant had ≥5CTC/7.5 ml WB. Two of these five, treated with 500 mg/month fulvestrant, had no detectable CTC‐expression of ER and BCL2 (an ER regulated gene). Three patients had heterogeneous CTC‐ER and BCL2 expression indicating incomplete degradation of the ER target by fulvestrant. Two of these patients received 250 mg/month whereas the third patient received 500 mg/month fulvestrant. Her cancer harbored a mutation (Y537S) in the estrogen receptor alpha gene (ESR1). All seven ER positive patients progressing on AIs had heterogeneous CTC‐ER expression. These results suggest heterogeneous mechanisms of resistance to fulvestrant, including insufficient dosage, ESR1 mutation, or conversion to dependence on non‐ER pathways. CTC enumeration, phenotyping, and genotyping might identify patients who would benefit from fulvestrant dose escalation versus switching to alternative therapies.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18780261 and 15747891
Volume :
10
Issue :
7
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Molecular Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.7957be4d2fea493c9246bb9e97afb0c8
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molonc.2016.04.006