Back to Search Start Over

Use of web-based decision support to improve informed choice for chemoprevention: a qualitative analysis of pre-implementation interviews (SWOG S1904)

Authors :
Alissa M. Michel
Haeseung Yi
Jacquelyn Amenta
Nicole Collins
Anna Vaynrub
Subiksha Umakanth
Garnet Anderson
Katie Arnold
Cynthia Law
Sandhya Pruthi
Ana Sandoval-Leon
Rachel Shirley
Maria Grosse Perdekamp
Sarah Colonna
Stacy Krisher
Tari King
Lisa D. Yee
Tarah J. Ballinger
Christa Braun-Inglis
Debra A. Mangino
Kari Wisinski
Claudia A. DeYoung
Masey Ross
Justin Floyd
Andrea Kaster
Lindi VanderWalde
Thomas J. Saphner
Corrine Zarwan
Shelly Lo
Cathy Graham
Alison Conlin
Kathleen Yost
Doreen Agnese
Cheryl Jernigan
Dawn L. Hershman
Marian L. Neuhouser
Banu Arun
Katherine D. Crew
Rita Kukafka
Source :
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 1-15 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
BMC, 2024.

Abstract

Abstract Background Women with high-risk breast lesions, such as atypical hyperplasia (AH) or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), have a 4- to tenfold increased risk of breast cancer compared to women with non-proliferative breast disease. Despite high-quality data supporting chemoprevention, uptake remains low. Interventions are needed to break down barriers. Methods The parent trial, MiCHOICE, is a cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness and implementation of patient and provider decision support tools to improve informed choice about chemoprevention among women with AH or LCIS. For this pre-implementation analysis, 25 providers participated in semi-structured interviews prior to accessing decision support tools. Interviews sought to understand attitudes/beliefs and barriers/facilitators to chemoprevention. Results Interviews with 25 providers (18 physicians and 7 advanced practice providers) were included. Providers were predominantly female (84%), white (72%), and non-Hispanic (88%). Nearly all providers (96%) had prescribed chemoprevention for eligible patients. Three themes emerged in qualitative analysis. The first theme describes providers’ confidence in chemoprevention and the utility of decision support tools. The second theme elucidates barriers to chemoprevention, including time constraints, risk communication and perceptions of patients’ fear of side effects and anxiety. The third theme is the need for early implementation of decision support tools. Conclusions This qualitative study suggests that providers were interested in the early inclusion of decision aids (DA) in their chemoprevention discussion workflow. The DAs may help overcome certain barriers which were elucidated in these interviews, including patient level concerns about side effects, clinic time constraints and difficulty communicating risk. A multi-faceted intervention with a DA as one active component may be needed. Trial registration This trial was registered with the NIH clinical trial registry, clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04496739.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14726947
Volume :
24
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.7ac042041f3a4b14993e75986bbff3f6
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02691-0