Back to Search Start Over

The Second International Asteroid Warning Network Timing Campaign: 2005 LW3

Authors :
Davide Farnocchia
Vishnu Reddy
James M. Bauer
Elizabeth M. Warner
Marco Micheli
Matthew J. Payne
Tony Farnham
Michael S. Kelley
Miguel R. Alarcon
Paolo Bacci
Roberto Bacci
Mauro Bachini
Kevin Baillié
Giorgio Baj
Daniel Bamberger
Anatoly P. Barkov
Stefan Beck
Guido Betti
Enrico Biancalani
Bryce T. Bolin
David Briggs
Luca Buzzi
Haowen Cheng
Eric Christensen
Alessandro Coffano
Luca Conversi
Christophe Demeautis
Larry Denneau
Josselin Desmars
Anlaug A. Djupvik
Leonid Elenin
Paolo Fini
Tobias Felber
Randy Flynn
Gianni Galli
Mikael Granvik
Bill Gray
Zuri Gray
Luca Grazzini
Werner Hasubick
Tobias Hoffmann
Robert Holmes
Marco Iozzi
Alexander L. Ivanov
Viktor A. Ivanov
Natalya V. Ivanova
Cristóvão Jacques
Hai Jiang
Zheng Jinghui
Anni Kasikov
Myung-Jin Kim
Balaji Kumar
Hee-Jae Lee
Bin Li
Jing Liu
Javier Licandro
Tyler Linder
Vadim E. Lysenkov
Martina Maestripieri
Andrea Mantero
Vladimiro Marinello
Jennie McCormick
Darrel Moon
Alessandro Nastasi
James D. Neill
Guenther Neue
Artem O. Novichonok
Francisco Ocaña
Gianpaolo Pizzetti
Anton Pomazan
Josiah N. Purdum
Christophe Ratinaud
Dong-Goo Roh
Filipp D. Romanov
Nello Ruocco
Toni Santana-Ros
Toni Scarmato
Anastasia Schmalz
Sergei Schmalz
Miquel Serra-Ricart
Clay Sherrod
Nick Sioulas
Andrea Soffiantini
Giacomo Succi
David J. Tholen
Jeppe S. Thomsen
William Thuillot
Richard Wainscoat
Guy Wells
Robert Weryk
Nikolai A. Yakovenko
Hong-Suh Yim
Chengxing Zhai
Source :
The Planetary Science Journal, Vol 4, Iss 11, p 203 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
IOP Publishing, 2023.

Abstract

The Earth close approach of near-Earth asteroid 2005 LW3 on 2022 November 23 represented a good opportunity for a second observing campaign to test the timing accuracy of astrometric observation. With 82 participating stations, the International Asteroid Warning Network collected 1046 observations of 2005 LW3 around the time of the close approach. Compared to the previous timing campaign targeting 2019 XS, some individual observers were able to significantly improve the accuracy of their reported observation times. In particular, U.S. surveys achieved good timing performance. However, no broad, systematic improvement was achieved compared to the previous campaign, with an overall negative bias persisting among the different observers. The calibration of observing times and the mitigation of timing errors should be important future considerations for observers and orbit computers, respectively.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
26323338
Volume :
4
Issue :
11
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
The Planetary Science Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.7cd61aae7b97417dbbf71cc872c9a4b7
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/acfd22