Back to Search Start Over

First‐Line Stent Retriever Versus Contact Aspiration or Combined Technique for Endovascular Therapy of Posterior Cerebral Artery Occlusion Stroke: The PLATO Study

Authors :
Thanh N. Nguyen
Mohamad Abdalkader
Muhammad M. Qureshi
Patrik Michel
Davide Strambo
Daniel Strbian
Christian Herweh
Markus A. Möhlenbruch
Silja Räty
Marta Olive‐Gadea
Marc Ribo
Marios Psychogios
Urs Fischer
Anh Nguyen
Joji B. Kuramatsu
David Haupenthal
Martin Köhrmann
Cornelius Deuschl
Jordi Kühne Escolà
Jelle Demeestere
Lieselotte Vandewalle
Shadi Yaghi
Liqi Shu
Volker Puetz
Daniel P.O. Kaiser
Johannes Kaesmacher
Adnan Mujanovic
Dominique Cornelius Marterstock
Tobias Engelhorn
Piers Klein
Diogo C. Haussen
Mahmoud H. Mohammaden
Isabel Fragata
Bruno Cunha
Hend Abdelhamid
Michele Romoli
Francesco Diana
Pekka Virtanen
Kimmo Lappalainen
Jessica Jesser
Judith Clark
Stavros Matsoukas
Johanna T. Fifi
Sunil A. Sheth
Sergio Salazar‐Marioni
João Pedro Marto
João Nuno Ramos
Milena Miszczuk
Christoph Riegler
Sven Poli
Khouloud Poli
Ashutosh P. Jadhav
Shashvat M. Desai
Volker Maus
Maximilian Kaeder
Hesham E. Masoud
Neil Suryadareva
Maxim Mokin
James E. Siegler
Italo Linfante
Guilherme Dabus
Negar Asdaghi
Vasu Saini
Christian H. Nolte
Eberhard Siebert
Thomas R. Meinel
Charlotte S. Weyland
Uta Hanning
Lukas Meyer
Raul G. Nogueira
Peter A. Ringleb
Simon Nagel
Source :
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology, Vol 4, Iss 1 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Wiley, 2024.

Abstract

Background The optimal reperfusion technique in patients with isolated posterior cerebral artery (PCA) occlusion is uncertain. We compared clinical and technical outcomes with first‐line stent retriever (SR), contact aspiration (CA), or combined techniques in patients with isolated PCA occlusion. Methods This international case–control study was conducted at 30 sites in Europe and North America and included consecutive patients with isolated PCA occlusion presenting within 24 hours of time last seen well from January 2015 to August 2022. The primary outcome was the first‐pass effect (FPE), defined as expanded Treatment in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 2c/3 on the first pass. Patients treated with SR, CA, or combined technique were compared with multivariable logistic regression. Results There were 326 patients who met inclusion criteria, 56.1% male, median age 75 (interquartile range 65–82) years, and median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 8 (5–12). Occlusion segments were PCA‐P1 (53.1%), P2 (40.5%), and other (6.4%). Intravenous thrombolysis was administered in 39.6%. First‐line technique was SR, CA, and combined technique in 43 (13.2%), 106 (32.5%), and 177 (54.3%) patients, respectively; FPE was achieved in 62.8%, 42.5%, and 39.6%, respectively. FPE was lower in patients treated with first‐line CA or combined technique compared with SR (CA versus SR: adjusted odds ratio 0.45 [0.19–1.06]; P=0.07; combined versus SR: adjusted odds ratio 0.35 [0.016–0.80]; P=0.01). There were lower odds of functional independence (modified Rankin scale score 0–2) in the first‐line CA versus SR alone group (adjusted odds ratio 0.52 [0.28–0.95]; P=0.04). FPE was associated with higher rates of favorable outcomes (modified Rankin scale score 0–2: 58% versus 43.4%; P=0.01; modified Rankin scale score 0–1: 36.6% versus 25.8%; P=0.05). Overall, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was present in 5.6% (18/326) and mortality in 10.9% (35/326) without difference between first‐line technique. Conclusion In patients with isolated PCA occlusion, SR was associated with a higher rate of FPE compared with CA or combined techniques with no difference in final successful reperfusion. Functional independence at 90 days was more likely with first‐line SR compared with CA. FPE was associated with better 90‐day clinical outcomes.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
26945746
Volume :
4
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.8883f278d7e44028acacb117ea5b5f0
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/SVIN.123.001004