Back to Search Start Over

Machine learning for accurate estimation of fetal gestational age based on ultrasound images

Authors :
Lok Hin Lee
Elizabeth Bradburn
Rachel Craik
Mohammad Yaqub
Shane A. Norris
Leila Cheikh Ismail
Eric O. Ohuma
Fernando C. Barros
Ann Lambert
Maria Carvalho
Yasmin A. Jaffer
Michael Gravett
Manorama Purwar
Qingqing Wu
Enrico Bertino
Shama Munim
Aung Myat Min
Zulfiqar Bhutta
Jose Villar
Stephen H. Kennedy
J. Alison Noble
Aris T. Papageorghiou
Source :
npj Digital Medicine, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Nature Portfolio, 2023.

Abstract

Abstract Accurate estimation of gestational age is an essential component of good obstetric care and informs clinical decision-making throughout pregnancy. As the date of the last menstrual period is often unknown or uncertain, ultrasound measurement of fetal size is currently the best method for estimating gestational age. The calculation assumes an average fetal size at each gestational age. The method is accurate in the first trimester, but less so in the second and third trimesters as growth deviates from the average and variation in fetal size increases. Consequently, fetal ultrasound late in pregnancy has a wide margin of error of at least ±2 weeks’ gestation. Here, we utilise state-of-the-art machine learning methods to estimate gestational age using only image analysis of standard ultrasound planes, without any measurement information. The machine learning model is based on ultrasound images from two independent datasets: one for training and internal validation, and another for external validation. During validation, the model was blinded to the ground truth of gestational age (based on a reliable last menstrual period date and confirmatory first-trimester fetal crown rump length). We show that this approach compensates for increases in size variation and is even accurate in cases of intrauterine growth restriction. Our best machine-learning based model estimates gestational age with a mean absolute error of 3.0 (95% CI, 2.9–3.2) and 4.3 (95% CI, 4.1–4.5) days in the second and third trimesters, respectively, which outperforms current ultrasound-based clinical biometry at these gestational ages. Our method for dating the pregnancy in the second and third trimesters is, therefore, more accurate than published methods.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
23986352
Volume :
6
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
npj Digital Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.8aeaef74800948f58affc961b675d663
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00774-2