Back to Search Start Over

Comparative analysis of salivary cortisol measurements using different assay methods in relation to serum-free cortisol measurement

Authors :
Anna Lee
Sooah Jang
Sanghoo Lee
Hyun-Kyung Park
In-Young Kim
Ryunsup Ahn
Jeong-Ho Seok
Kyoung-Ryul Lee
Source :
Practical Laboratory Medicine, Vol 40, Iss , Pp e00393- (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2024.

Abstract

Objectives: Salivary cortisol reflects the biologically active form of serum cortisol, offering a noninvasive evaluation method for the diurnal rhythm of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. While liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is known for its specificity, immunoassays (IA) are commonly used because of their simplicity. This study aimed to assess the performance of salivary cortisol measurement using both IA and LC-MS/MS in comparison to serum-free cortisol measurement. Methods: Assay results for 188 saliva and 94 serum samples from 47 participants were analyzed. Salivary samples collected at different time points were analyzed using IA and LC-MS/MS. Serum samples were analyzed for cortisol, cortisol-binding globulin, and free cortisol. The statistical analyses included correlations and method comparisons. Results: The diurnal salivary cortisol profiles exhibited a comparable circadian rhythm pattern; however, the concentrations measured using IA were consistently higher than those measured using LC-MS/MS. The correlation analysis revealed robust associations among salivary cortisol (IA), salivary cortisol (LC-MS/MS), and serum-free cortisol levels (LC-MS/MS). However, the method comparison revealed a systematic bias between IA and LC-MS/MS in salivary cortisol measurement. Conclusions: This study contributes to the ongoing debate on assay techniques by affirming the suitability of IA and LC-MS/MS for salivary cortisol measurement to assess dynamic changes in HPA axis activity. The identified systematic bias emphasizes the importance of selecting methods based on specific research or clinical requirements.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
23525517
Volume :
40
Issue :
e00393-
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Practical Laboratory Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.8d3ee40b96654437bf6e588b5e99ec61
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00393