Back to Search Start Over

Abstract Number ‐ 146: Re‐stenting Following Recurrence after Venous Sinus Stenosis Stenting for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

Authors :
Salvatore A D'Amato
Juan Carlos Martinez‐Gutierrez
Matthew J Kole
Allison C Engstrom
Tien Nguyen
Mehmat E Inam
Rosa Tang
Nagham Al‐Zubidi
Ore‐Ofeoluwatomi O Adesina
Sunil A Sheth
Peng Roc Chen
Source :
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology, Vol 3, Iss S1 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Wiley, 2023.

Abstract

Introduction Venous sinus stenosis (VSS) stenting in medically refractory Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (IIH) patients has emerged as an effective treatment with low rates of failure and recurrence. However, the best treatment strategy following recurrence of symptoms in previously stented patients with initial response is unclear and frequently leads to shunt placement. We investigated the role of re‐stenting in patients with recurrence after prior successful stenting. Methods This is a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained IIH registry. Inclusion criteria included patients with confirmed IIH and angiographically demonstrable VSS who underwent interventions from 2012–2022. Patients were divided into those who underwent a single stenting procedure (Group S) and those who underwent placement of an additional stent due to recurrence of clinical symptoms and angiographic stenosis (Group R). All re‐stenting was performed in adjacent or remote regions of stenosis. Bivariate analyses were utilized to compare clinical outcomes. Results 86 patients were included with a median age of 33 [IQR 26‐39] and 94% were females. Group S (79/86) and Group R (7/86) had similar baseline characteristics. There was similar improvement in post‐stenting opening pressure (22.4±6.7 vs. 25.2±4.6 cm H2O, p = 0.35, Group S vs. Group R), change in opening pressure (11.6±10.4 vs. 5.3±12.2 cm H2O, p = 0.20, Group S vs. Group R) and resolution of tinnitus (91.8 vs. 80%, p = 0.28, Group S vs. Group R). Headache improvement was higher in Group S at 6 weeks, but similar at 6 months (92.8 vs. 60%, p = 0.02 and 88.2 vs. 80%, p = 0.59, Group S vs. Group R). Group S also had higher improvement in visual disturbances at 6 months (93.8 vs. 60%, p = 0.01, Group S vs. Group R), but similar improvement in papilledema (92.2 vs 100%, p = 0.68, Group S vs. Group R). None of the re‐stented patients required VPS rescue. Conclusions VSS re‐stenting in IIH patients with recurrence after initial stenting is feasible with similar efficacy in reducing intracranial pressure and symptoms.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
26945746
Volume :
3
Issue :
S1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.8ef5beb405a40fcae01d79591af6bff
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/SVIN.03.suppl_1.146