Cite
In vitro efficacy of Er:YAG laser-activated irrigation versus passive ultrasonic irrigation and sonic-powered irrigation for treating multispecies biofilms in artificial grooves and dentinal tubules: an SEM and CLSM study
MLA
Pingping Bao, et al. “In Vitro Efficacy of Er:YAG Laser-Activated Irrigation versus Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation and Sonic-Powered Irrigation for Treating Multispecies Biofilms in Artificial Grooves and Dentinal Tubules: An SEM and CLSM Study.” BMC Oral Health, vol. 24, no. 1, Feb. 2024, pp. 1–14. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04042-x.
APA
Pingping Bao, He Liu, Lan Yang, Lulu Zhang, Liwei Yang, Nannan Xiao, Jing Shen, Jiayin Deng, & Ya Shen. (2024). In vitro efficacy of Er:YAG laser-activated irrigation versus passive ultrasonic irrigation and sonic-powered irrigation for treating multispecies biofilms in artificial grooves and dentinal tubules: an SEM and CLSM study. BMC Oral Health, 24(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04042-x
Chicago
Pingping Bao, He Liu, Lan Yang, Lulu Zhang, Liwei Yang, Nannan Xiao, Jing Shen, Jiayin Deng, and Ya Shen. 2024. “In Vitro Efficacy of Er:YAG Laser-Activated Irrigation versus Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation and Sonic-Powered Irrigation for Treating Multispecies Biofilms in Artificial Grooves and Dentinal Tubules: An SEM and CLSM Study.” BMC Oral Health 24 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1186/s12903-024-04042-x.