Back to Search
Start Over
Surgical Efficiency Comparison Between Two Phacoemulsification Systems
- Source :
- Clinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 18, Pp 1095-1102 (2024)
- Publication Year :
- 2024
- Publisher :
- Dove Medical Press, 2024.
-
Abstract
- Marta Ibarz-Barberá,1 Paz Orts-Vila,2 Fátima Martínez-Galdón,1 Noemí Martín-García,2 Pedro Tañá-Rivero2 1Cataract and Refractive Surgery Department, Madrid, Spain; 2Cataract and Refractive Surgery Department, Alicante, SpainCorrespondence: Marta Ibarz-Barberá, Oftalvist Madrid, Avda Valladolid, 81, Madrid, 28008, Spain, Tel +34 915426010, Email marta@martaibarz.comPurpose: To assess the surgical efficiency in cataract surgery comparing two phacoemulsification systems.Methods: Prospective, consecutive-comparative study in a two-site private practice. Three hundred and one eyes undergoing standard or femtosecond laser-assisted (FLACS) cataract surgery with either the R-Evo Smart (BVI, Waltham, USA) and/or the Centurion Vision System (Alcon, Fort Worth, USA). Preoperative eye characteristics (degree of cataract using the lens opacities classification system LOCS III grading) and intraoperative outcomes (total ultrasound time and total estimated fluid aspirated/drainage bag weighting) were registered in all cases.Results: One hundred and fifty-five eyes undergone cataract surgery with the R-Evo Smart and 146 eyes with the Centurion Vision System phacoemulsification systems. Mean cataract grade was 3.07 ± 0.78 and 2.96 ± 0.85 for the R-Evo Smart and Centurion Vision System groups, respectively (p = 0.12). Mean total ultrasound time was 18.99 ± 12.85 and 40.24 ± 21.91 seconds for the R-Evo Smart and Centurion Vision System groups, respectively (p < 0.01). Mean total estimated fluid aspirated/drainage bag weighting was 53.00 ± 14.56 g and 54.33 ± 14.88 cc for the R-Evo Smart and Centurion Vision System groups, respectively (p = 0.21). Considering non-FLACS surgery (98 eyes with the R-Evo Smart and 63 eyes with the Centurion Vision System), mean cataract grade was 2.95 ± 0.74 and 2.97 ± 0.91 for the R-Evo Smart and Centurion Vision System groups, respectively (p = 0.44). Mean total ultrasound time was 19.96 ± 11.20 and 42.84 ± 28.35 seconds for the R-Evo Smart and Centurion Vision System groups, respectively (p < 0.01). Mean total estimated fluid aspirated/drainage bag weighting was 55.95 ± 14.76 g and 55.97 ± 13.62 cc for the R-Evo Smart and Centurion Vision System groups, respectively (p = 0.49). No adverse events were found in the two groups of eyes.Conclusion: The objective measurement of surgical efficiency through total ultrasound time during lens removal and fluid consumption during both lens removal and irrigation/aspiration proved R-Evo Smart to be an efficient phacoemulsification platform, in comparison with the current standard of care Centurion Vision System.Keywords: cataract, estimated fluid aspirated, phacoemulsification, surgical efficiency, ultrasound time
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 11775483
- Volume :
- ume 18
- Database :
- Directory of Open Access Journals
- Journal :
- Clinical Ophthalmology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- edsdoj.945d3b5a1b64c26aacc5a88544e30f4
- Document Type :
- article