Back to Search Start Over

Sinology: Chinese Intellectual History and Transcultural Studies

Sinology: Chinese Intellectual History and Transcultural Studies

Authors :
Pablo Blitstein
Source :
The Journal of Transcultural Studies, Vol 7, Iss 2, Pp 136-167 (2017)
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
Heidelberg University Publishing, 2017.

Abstract

In this article I attempt to identify some methodological connections between Chinese intellectual history and transcultural studies in Euro-American academia. I will focus on one shared methodological point: the critique of so-called “methodological nationalism,” that is, of the assumption (explicit or not) that the nation is the ultimate framework for research. Although this critique is a constitutive principle of transcultural studies, and it only represents a particular, and not necessarily mainstream, approach in Chinese intellectual history, the two fields have developed a shared agenda in this regard. In order to explain the tensions and convergences, I will first offer a quick historical overview of the two fields. First, I will focus on the contrast between old and new uses of the concept of “transcultural”; then I will contextualize Chinese intellectual history within the longer history of classical sinology and area studies. After this overview, I will explain their respective relations towards methodological nationalism and give evidence, in their recent history, of some intersecting points between the two.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
21916411
Volume :
7
Issue :
2
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
The Journal of Transcultural Studies
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.965a9b8fbc32437b9442eb7b9a685f66
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.17885/heiup.ts.2016.2.23601