Back to Search Start Over

International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) consensus on miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Authors :
Guo-Hua Zeng
Wen Zhong
Giorgio Mazzon
Wei Zhu
Sven Lahme
Sanjay Khadgi
Janak Desai
Madhu Agrawal
David Schulsinger
Mantu Gupta
Emanuele Montanari
Juan Manuel Lopez Martinez
Shabir Almousawi
Vincent Emanuel F. Malonzo
Seshadri Sriprasad
Chu Ann Chai
Vimoshan Arumuham
Stefania Ferretti
Wissam Kamal
Ke-Wei Xu
Fan Cheng
Xiao-Feng Gao
Ji-Wen Cheng
Bhaskar Somani
Mordechai Duvdevani
Kah Ann Git
Christian Seitz
Norberto Bernardo
Tarek Ahmed Amin Ibrahim
Albert Aquino
Takahiro Yasui
Cristian Fiori
Thomas Knoll
Athanasios Papatsoris
Nariman Gadzhiev
Ulanbek Zhanbyrbekuly
Oriol Angerri
Hugo Lopez Ramos
Iliya Saltirov
Mohamad Moussa
Guido Giusti
Fabio Vicentini
Edgar Beltran Suarez
Margaret Pearle
Glenn M. Preminger
Qing-Hui Wu
Otas Durutovic
Khurshid Ghani
Marcus Maroccolo
Marianne Brehmer
Palle J. Osther
Marek Zawadzki
Azimdjon Tursunkulov
Monolov Nurbek Kytaibekovich
Abdusamad Abdukakhorovich Abuvohidov
Cesar Antonio Recalde Lara
Zamari Noori
Stefano Paolo Zanetti
Sunil Shrestha
Jean de la Rosette
John Denstedt
Zhang-Qun Ye
Kemal Sarica
Simon Choong
Source :
Military Medical Research, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
BMC, 2024.

Abstract

Abstract Over the past three decades, there has been increasing interest in miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) techniques featuring smaller tracts as they offer potential solutions to mitigate complications associated with standard PCNL (sPCNL). However, despite this growing acceptance and recognition of its benefits, unresolved controversies and acknowledged limitations continue to impede widespread adoption due to a lack of consensus on optimal perioperative management strategies and procedural tips and tricks. In response to these challenges, an international panel comprising experts from the International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) took on the task of compiling an expert consensus document on mPCNL procedures aimed at providing urologists with a comprehensive clinical framework for practice. This endeavor involved conducting a systematic literature review to identify research gaps (RGs), which formed the foundation for developing a structured questionnaire survey. Subsequently, a two-round modified Delphi survey was implemented, culminating in a group meeting to generate final evidence-based comments. All 64 experts completed the second-round survey, resulting in a response rate of 100.0%. Fifty-eight key questions were raised focusing on mPCNLs within 4 main domains, including general information (13 questions), preoperative work-up (13 questions), procedural tips and tricks (19 questions), and postoperative evaluation and follow-up (13 questions). Additionally, 9 questions evaluated the experts’ experience with PCNLs. Consensus was reached on 30 questions after the second-round survey, while professional statements for the remaining 28 key questions were provided after discussion in an online panel meeting. mPCNL, characterized by a tract smaller than 18 Fr and an innovative lithotripsy technique, has firmly established itself as a viable and effective approach for managing upper urinary tract stones in both adults and pediatrics. It offers several advantages over sPCNL including reduced bleeding, fewer requirements for nephrostomy tubes, decreased pain, and shorter hospital stays. The series of detailed techniques presented here serve as a comprehensive guide for urologists, aiming to improve their procedural understanding and optimize patient outcomes.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20549369
Volume :
11
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Military Medical Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.96fb246260442ba90f21313c36203db
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-024-00562-3