Back to Search Start Over

Arthroscopic Treatment Yields Lower Reoperation Rates than Open Treatment for Native Knee but Not Native Shoulder Septic Arthritis

Authors :
Ajay S. Padaki, M.D.
Gabrielle C. Ma, B.S.
Nicole M. Truong, B.S.
Charles J. Cogan, M.D.
Drew A. Lansdown, M.D.
Brian T. Feeley, M.D.
C. Benjamin Ma, M.D.
Alan L. Zhang, M.D.
Source :
Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation, Vol 4, Iss 3, Pp e1167-e1178 (2022)
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2022.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the incidence, patient demographics, complication rates, readmission rates, and reoperation rates of open and arthroscopic surgery performed for septic arthritis in native knee and shoulder joints. Methods: Records of patients who were diagnosed with native knee or shoulder septic arthritis and underwent open or arthroscopic irrigation and debridement (I&D) between 2015 and 2018 were queried from the PearlDiver Mariner Database. International Classification of Diseases 10th (ICD-10) diagnosis and procedure codes were used to identify patients and track reoperations. Reoperation procedures, including revision open and arthroscopic I&D, were analyzed at 1 month, 1 year, and 2 years. Complications, emergency department (ED) admissions, and hospital readmissions within 30 days were analyzed and compared between the open and arthroscopic cohorts. Results: The query resulted with 1,993 patients who underwent knee I&D (75.3% arthroscopic, 24.7% open, P < .001) and 476 patients who underwent shoulder I&D (64.8% arthroscopic, 35.2% open, P < .001). One-month complication rates (11.6-22.7%) and hospital readmission rates (15.8-19.6%) were similar for arthroscopic and open treatment for knee and shoulder septic arthritis. Reoperation rates for revision I&D of the knee were higher after open compared to arthroscopic treatment at 1 month, 1 and 2 years (20.9% vs. 16.7%, 32.5% vs 27.6% and 34.1% vs. 29.4%, P < .05, respectively). For shoulder septic arthritis 1-month, 1-year, and 2-year reoperation rates were similar for open and arthroscopic treatment (16.0% vs 11.7%, 22.0% vs 19.3%, and 22.7% vs 20.0%, P = .57, respectively). Lastly, 6.7% of patients with native septic knee arthritis underwent subsequent arthroplasty by 2 years. Conclusion: Arthroscopic treatment carries a lower reoperation rate than open surgery for knee septic arthritis, but in the shoulder, the risk for revision I&D is similar after arthroscopic or open surgery.

Subjects

Subjects :
Sports medicine
RC1200-1245

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2666061X
Volume :
4
Issue :
3
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.9aee3e1af95c47b9869e30dfad130af9
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2022.04.014