Effect of fluvoxamine on lipid metabolism in hospitalized adolescent patients with depressive disorder

BackgroundFluvoxamine is increasingly used in the treatment for depressive disorder in adolescents. However， little research has been done on the effect of fluvoxamine on lipid metabolism， and the disordered lipid metabolism would cause severe harm to the health of patients and affect relevant prognosis.ObjectiveTo analyze the effect of fluvoxamine on lipid metabolism in adolescent patients with depressive disorder and to investigate the safety of fluvoxamine treatment.MethodsFrom June 2022 to June 2023， 60 adolescent patients with depressive disorder were involved， who met the diagnostic criteria of International Classification of Diseases， tenth edition （ICD-10） and received inpatient treatments in Shanxi Mental Health Center. These cases were randomly divided into study group （receiving fluvoxamine treatment） and control group （receiving sertraline treatment） with 30 cases in each group. The treatment period was 4 weeks. At baseline as well as 2 weeks and 4 weeks after treatment， both groups' indexes of fasting lipid metabolism were measured， including serum total cholesterol （TC）， triglycerides （TG）， high-density lipoprotein （HDL） and low-density lipoprotein （LDL）， and Hamilton Depression Scale-17 item （HAMD-17） was adopted. The levels of lipid metabolism indexes and HAMD-17 score were compared between the two groups at different follow-up time points.ResultsFor HAMD-17 score， the time effect was statistically significant （F=849.687， P0.05）. For TC levels， the inter-group effect was not statistically significant （F=1.461， P=0.232）， but the time effect and interaction effect were statistically significant （F=13.129， 5.029， P0.05）， but the interaction effect was statistically significant （F=7.577， P=0.004）. For HDL levels， the time effect， inter-group effect and interaction effect were not statistically significant （F=1.079， 0.160， 1.877， P>0.05）. For LDL levels， there was no statistical significance in the inter-group effect （F=0.019， P=0.891）， while statistical significance was observed in both time effect and interaction effect （F=6.721， 9.075， P