Back to Search Start Over

Benchmark data for verifying background model implementations in orbit and gravity field determination software

Authors :
M. Lasser
U. Meyer
A. Jäggi
T. Mayer-Gürr
A. Kvas
K. H. Neumayer
C. Dahle
F. Flechtner
J.-M. Lemoine
I. Koch
M. Weigelt
J. Flury
Source :
Advances in Geosciences, Vol 55, Pp 1-11 (2020)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Copernicus Publications, 2020.

Abstract

In the framework of the COmbination Service for Time-variable Gravity fields (COST-G) gravity field solutions from different analysis centres are combined to provide a consolidated solution of improved quality and robustness to the user. As in many other satellite-related sciences, the correct application of background models plays a crucial role in gravity field determination. Therefore, we publish a set of data of various commonly used forces in orbit and gravity field modelling (Earth's gravity field, tides etc.) evaluated along a one day orbit arc of GRACE, together with auxiliary data to enable easy comparisons. The benchmark data is compiled with the GROOPS software by the Institute of Geodesy (IfG) at Graz University of Technology. It is intended to be used as a reference data set and provides the opportunity to test the implementation of these models at various institutions involved in orbit and gravity field determination from satellite tracking data. In view of the COST-G GRACE and GRACE Follow-On gravity field combinations, we document the outcome of the comparison of the background force models for the Bernese GNSS software from AIUB (Astronomical Institute, University of Bern), the EPOS software of the German Research Centre for Geosciences (GFZ), the GINS software, developed and maintained by the Groupe de Recherche de Géodésie Spatiale (GRGS), the GRACE-SIGMA software of the Leibniz University of Hannover (LUH) and the GRASP software also developed at LUH. We consider differences in the force modelling for GRACE (-FO) which are one order of magnitude smaller than the accelerometer noise of about 10−10 m s−2 to be negligible and formulate this as a benchmark for new analysis centres, which are interested to contribute to the COST-G initiative.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16807340 and 16807359
Volume :
55
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Advances in Geosciences
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.9d3207b27ac94ae08c0667d2e22a6e2e
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-55-1-2020