Back to Search
Start Over
Comparing monotherapy with tadalafil or tamsulosin in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: A case–control study
- Source :
- Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research, Vol 15, Iss 3, Pp 161-165 (2024)
- Publication Year :
- 2024
- Publisher :
- Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2024.
-
Abstract
- Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a chronic disorder that inflicts severe symptoms on middle-aged men. The current study compared the effects of tadalafil and tamsulosin on urological parameters after 3 and 6 months of therapy. A retrospective case–control study was conducted, in which 100 patients with moderately severe BPH were divided into two groups based on their treatment: 50 patients were given tamsulosin 0.4 mg/day and group 50 patients were administered tadalafil 5 mg daily. All patients continued therapy for approximately 6 months, and their urological parameters were assessed at baseline and after 3 and 6 months. There was no significant difference in the overall effect on the International Prostate Symptom Score at the end of the study using two-way ANOVA analysis (P = 0.448). The intercourse number was significantly improved by tadalafil compared to tamsulosin (P < 0.001). The prostatic-specific antigen, postvoiding residual, and prostatic volumes were not significantly different between tadalafil and tamsulosin (P = 0.198, 0.163, and 0.183, respectively). In conclusion, tadalafil, 5 mg once daily, appears to have similar efficacy to tamsulosin, with significant improvement in the patient’s erectile function. Tadalafil can be used for 6 months for moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms.
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 22314040 and 09762094
- Volume :
- 15
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- Directory of Open Access Journals
- Journal :
- Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- edsdoj.9d358d9b07794c78b4d152c5314b94a9
- Document Type :
- article
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.4103/JAPTR.JAPTR_87_24